§

Harborside Healthcare, Inc.

343 N.L.R.B. 906 (N.L.R.B. 2004)
Harborside Healthcare, Inc.

22 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. National Labor Rel. B. v. Kentucky R. Comm. C

    532 U.S. 706 (2001)   Cited 180 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the burden of proving a statutory exception generally falls on the party who claims a benefit

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Curtin Matheson Scientific, Inc.

    494 U.S. 775 (1990)   Cited 177 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Board has "considerable deference" in determining the legal rule to apply and should be upheld "as long as it is rational and consistent with the Act"

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Health Care & Retirement Corp. of America

    511 U.S. 571 (1994)   Cited 96 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the Board's test is inconsistent with both the statutory language and th[e] Court's precedents"

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Savair Manufacturing Co.

    414 U.S. 270 (1973)   Cited 123 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Noting that although an employee may not be "legally bound to vote for the union and has not promised to do so in any formal sense" some "would feel obliged " to cast a union vote after having signed a union recognition slip

  6. Labor Board v. Tower Co.

    329 U.S. 324 (1946)   Cited 259 times
    Describing the Board's goals for its election rules and regulations

  7. Hendrix Manufacturing Company v. N.L.R.B

    321 F.2d 100 (5th Cir. 1963)   Cited 91 times
    Permitting the Board to consider the employer's clear expression of opposition to the union as background in order to determine motivation for management's conduct

  8. Harborside Healthcare, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    230 F.3d 206 (6th Cir. 2000)   Cited 9 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Analyzing nature of supervisory authority to determine whether effect of charge nurse's conduct was coercive

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Regional Home Care Services, Inc.

    237 F.3d 62 (1st Cir. 2001)   Cited 5 times
    Holding that the Court is limited to determining whether the Board acted within its discretion in the conduct of elections

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Superior Coatings, Inc.

    839 F.2d 1178 (6th Cir. 1988)   Cited 15 times

    No. 86-5587. Argued December 18, 1986. Decided February 18, 1988. Fred Cornell, argued, Aileen Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel, N.L. R.B., Howard E. Perlstein, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Craig A. Mutch, argued, Grand Rapids, Mich., and J. Michael Guenther, Ann Arbor, Mich., for respondent. Before MARTIN and GUY, Circuit Judges, and JOHNSTONE, District Judge. Honorable Edward H. Johnstone, United States District Court, Western District of Kentucky, sitting by designation. PER CURIAM