Hammermill Paper Co.
3 Cited authorities
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Pincus Bros.
620 F.2d 367 (3d Cir. 1980) Cited 36 timesIn Pincus Brothers, the Third Circuit merely concluded that, under the particular facts of that case, it was "at least arguable" that the employee published a defamatory statement known to be false.
Gould, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
612 F.2d 728 (3d Cir. 1979) Cited 21 timesDenying enforcement to 237 N.L.R.B. 881
Gould, Inc. v. Fuchs
486 F. Supp. 164 (D. Conn. 1980) Cited 1 timesCiv. No. H-79-724. March 7, 1980. Edward T. Dodd, Jr., Keefe Dodd, Waterbury, Conn., Garry M. Ewing, John G. Kruckho, Towson, Md., for plaintiff. Ronald Lasky, Sub Region 39, N.L.R.B., Hartford, Conn., Margery E. Lieber, Deputy Asst. Gen. Counsel for Sp. Litigation, N.L.R.B., Lynne E. Deitch, NLRB, Washington, D.C., for defendants. MEMORANDUM OF DECISION BLUMENFELD, Senior District Judge. The National Labor Relations Board (the Board), acting through its Regional Director, scheduled a representation