§

Hamilton Plastics

291 N.L.R.B. 529 (N.L.R.B. 1988)
Hamilton Plastics

11 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Brown

    380 U.S. 278 (1965)   Cited 473 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Approving finding of § 8 violation when "employers' conduct is demonstrably so destructive of employee rights and so devoid of significant service to any legitimate business end that it cannot be tolerated consistently with the Act"

  2. American Ship Bldg. v. Labor Board

    380 U.S. 300 (1965)   Cited 351 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a lockout "for the sole purpose of bringing economic pressure to bear in support of [the employer's] legitimate bargaining position" is lawful

  3. Teamsters Local v. Labor Board

    365 U.S. 667 (1961)   Cited 174 times
    Holding that the Board may not dictate specific procedures and rules that a union must adopt, not that the Board errs when it determines that a union engaged in unfair labor practices by failing to operate in accordance with objective criteria

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Rain-Ware, Inc.

    732 F.2d 1349 (7th Cir. 1984)   Cited 20 times
    Concluding that "[t]he timing of the layoffs and warehouse closing provides the strongest support for connecting anti-union sentiment with the layoffs," where the layoffs and warehouse closing closely followed a demand for union recognition

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Melrose Processing Co.

    351 F.2d 693 (8th Cir. 1965)   Cited 33 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Melrose Processing Co., 8 Cir., 351 F.2d 693, also decided since this case was submitted, this court stated that if the factual conclusion of the Board is based upon substantial evidence on the whole record, this court must accept such factual determination as binding. Jas. H. Matthews Co. v. N.L.R.B., 8 Cir., 354 F.2d 432, decided December 29, 1965, adheres to these principles.

  6. Frosty Morn Meats, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    296 F.2d 617 (5th Cir. 1961)   Cited 33 times
    Moving cause

  7. United States Rubber Company v. N.L.R.B

    384 F.2d 660 (5th Cir. 1968)   Cited 15 times

    No. 23129. October 25, 1967. Rehearing Denied February 6, 1968. Theo F. Weiss, San Antonio, Tex., Seymour Swerdlow, New York City, for petitioner, United States Rubber Co., Clemens, Knight, Weiss Spencer, San Antonio, Tex., Arthur, Dry, Kalish, Taylor Wood, New York City, of counsel. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Glen M. Bendixsen, Atty., N.L.R.B., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel., Warren M. Laddon, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C.,

  8. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    354 F.2d 707 (5th Cir. 1966)   Cited 17 times

    No. 22180. January 10, 1966. H.L. Deakins, Jr., Houston, Tex., Fulbright, Crooker, Freeman, Bates Jaworski, Houston, Tex., of counsel, for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Paul M. Thompson, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Atty., N.L.R.B., for respondent. Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, COLEMAN, Circuit Judge, and HUNTER, District Judge. HUNTER, District Judge. The Great Atlantic and Pacific

  9. Ames Ready-Mix Concrete, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    411 F.2d 1159 (8th Cir. 1969)   Cited 3 times

    No. 19327. June 5, 1969. D.R. Newbrough, of Hegland, Newbrough, Johnston Brewer, Ames, Iowa, for petitioner; Daniel G. Jacobowski, of Jacobowski, Kenney Conway, St. Paul, Minn., with him on the brief and reply brief. Corinna Lothar Metcalf, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., N.L.R.B., with her on the brief. Before BLACKMUN, MEHAFFY and HEANEY

  10. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Bird Mach. Co.

    161 F.2d 589 (1st Cir. 1947)   Cited 20 times

    No. 4219. May 20, 1947. Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Proceeding by the National Labor Relations Board against Bird Machine Company for an enforcement of an order of the board. Decree enforcing order of board granted. Owsley Vose, N.L.R.B., of Washington, D.C. (Gerhard P. Van Arkel, Gen. Counsel, Morris P. Glushein, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Frances Lopinsky, all of Washington, D.C., of counsel), for petitioner

  11. Section 6621 - Determination of rate of interest

    26 U.S.C. § 6621   Cited 1,892 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Applying a higher interest rate to past liabilities resulting from tax-motivated transactions