§
Hajoca Corp.

13 Cited authorities

  1. SCM Corp. v. Advance Business Systems & Supply Co.

    397 U.S. 920 (1970)   Cited 200 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Upholding a delay of three months where only prejudice shown was that the defendants could not recall details of the days in the distant past; no special circumstances

  2. Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    321 U.S. 678 (1944)   Cited 269 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that offers of benefits to union supporters that induce them to leave the union violate § 8

  3. Laidlaw Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    414 F.2d 99 (7th Cir. 1969)   Cited 81 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that while an employer is not obligated to discharge permanent replacements to make room for returning economic strikers, the employer must place the former strikers on a preferential recall list

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Carilli

    648 F.2d 1206 (9th Cir. 1981)   Cited 38 times
    In NLRB v. Carilli, 648 F.2d 1206 (9th Cir. 1981), an employer cited § 186(c)(5)(B) in attacking the NLRB's finding that it violated Section 8(a)(5) of the NLRA by discontinuing payments to a trust fund.

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Windham Community Memorial Hosp

    577 F.2d 805 (2d Cir. 1978)   Cited 26 times
    Approving Board presumption

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Pennco, Inc.

    684 F.2d 340 (6th Cir. 1982)   Cited 18 times

    No. 80-1654. March 16, 1982. Rehearing Denied April 8, 1982. Certiorari Denied November 8, 1982. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., David Fleischer, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Gregory L. Monge, Van Antwerp, Hughes, Monge Jones, Ashland, Ky., for respondent. Before BROWN and KENNEDY, Circuit Judges and CHURCHILL, District Judge. The Honorable James P. Churchill, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation. ORDER The Board petitions

  7. Mingtree Restaurant, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    736 F.2d 1295 (9th Cir. 1984)   Cited 15 times
    Finding Board's application of same standard to elections, employer polls, and withdrawals of recognition "untenable"

  8. Thomas Industries, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    687 F.2d 863 (6th Cir. 1982)   Cited 16 times
    In Thomas Industries, 687 F.2d at 869, this Court, in finding that a poll satisfied the procedural requirements set forth in Struksnes, relied in part on the fact that the union president was present, and spoke to employees before they voted.

  9. N.L.R.B. v. A. W. Thompson, Inc.

    651 F.2d 1141 (5th Cir. 1981)   Cited 16 times
    Describing how after repeated violations of an order "we would normally have no qualms about imposing a schedule of prospective fines"

  10. Orion Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    515 F.2d 81 (7th Cir. 1975)   Cited 22 times

    No. 74-1432. Argued January 15, 1975. Decided April 28, 1975. Walter S. Davis, Milwaukee, Wis., for petitioner. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, John D. Burgoyne and Roger T. Brice, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before CLARK, Associate Justice. and CUMMINGS and TONE, Circuit Judges. Associate Justice Tom C. Clark of the Supreme Court of the United States (Retired) is sitting by designation. PER CURIAM

  11. Section 5-A:3 - Withdrawal Action

    N.H. Rev. Stat. § 5-A:3   Cited 2 times   1 Legal Analyses

    As used in paragraph (c) of article 7 of the interpleader compact, the phrase "executive head" shall mean the governor of this state. In the event that the governor shall take any action pursuant to paragraph (c) of article 7 of such interpleader compact, he shall promptly notify the secretary of state and shall deposit with him copies of any and all official communication and documents relating to such action. The governor shall take appropriate action pursuant to paragraph (c) of article 7 of the