Hackney Iron & Steel Co.

7 Cited authorities

John Wiley Sons v. Livingston
376 U.S. 543 (1964) Cited 1,771 times 8 Legal Analyses
Holding that a court should decide whether an arbitration agreement survived a corporate merger and bound the resulting corporation
United Steelworkers of Amer. v. Reliance Univ
335 F.2d 891 (3d Cir. 1964) Cited 34 times
In Reliance Universal and Wackenhut, supra, one entity purchased the business of another and continued the previous operation without significant change, employing substantially all of the seller's organized personnel.
Wackenhut v. Int'l U., United Plant Guard W
332 F.2d 954 (9th Cir. 1964) Cited 33 times
In Wackenhut the purchaser acquired substantially all the assets of the seller and assumed substantially all the seller's liabilities, although it did not expressly assume the seller's labor agreement.
N.L.R.B. v. Auto Ventshade, Inc.
276 F.2d 303 (5th Cir. 1960) Cited 36 times
No. 17965. March 25, 1960. Rehearing Denied July 28, 1960. Melvin Pollack, Atty., Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, A. Brummel, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Alexander E. Wilson, Jr., John W. Wilcox, Jr. (of Wilson, Branch Barwick), Atlanta, Ga., for respondent. Before RIVES, Chief Judge, and CAMERON and WISDOM, Circuit Judges. WISDOM, Circuit Judge. In this case, as in National Labor Relations
N.L.R.B. v. Alamo White Truck Service, Inc.
273 F.2d 238 (5th Cir. 1959) Cited 22 times
No. 17764. December 29, 1959. Allison W. Brown, Jr., Atty., Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Frederick U. Reel, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for appellant. Theo. F. Weiss, Clemens, Knight, Weiss Spencer, San Antonio, Tex., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, JONES and WISDOM, Circuit Judges. WISDOM, Circuit Judge. The question for decision is whether the respondent is a successor employer, for the purpose of
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Burton-Dixie Corp.
210 F.2d 199 (10th Cir. 1954) Cited 9 times
In Burton-Dixie, as here, the employer's attitude made it quite clear that a later request would have been futile, and the court's holding there that the Board properly found a refusal to bargain suggests the propriety of a similar holding here.
Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy
29 U.S.C. § 151 Cited 5,092 times 34 Legal Analyses
Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"

Hackney Iron & Steel Co.

7 Cited authorities

John Wiley Sons v. Livingston

Holding that a court should decide whether an arbitration agreement survived a corporate merger and bound the resulting corporation

United Steelworkers of Amer. v. Reliance Univ

In Reliance Universal and Wackenhut, supra, one entity purchased the business of another and continued the previous operation without significant change, employing substantially all of the seller's organized personnel.

Wackenhut v. Int'l U., United Plant Guard W

In Wackenhut the purchaser acquired substantially all the assets of the seller and assumed substantially all the seller's liabilities, although it did not expressly assume the seller's labor agreement.

N.L.R.B. v. Auto Ventshade, Inc.

N.L.R.B. v. Alamo White Truck Service, Inc.

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Burton-Dixie Corp.

In Burton-Dixie, as here, the employer's attitude made it quite clear that a later request would have been futile, and the court's holding there that the Board properly found a refusal to bargain suggests the propriety of a similar holding here.

Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"