H. N. Thayer Co.

108 Cited authorities

  1. Touhy v. Ragen

    340 U.S. 462 (1951)   Cited 694 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a subordinate agency employee cannot be compelled to comply with a subpoena duces tecum where a valid agency regulation prohibits such compliance in the absence of agency authorization, and where no authorization has been granted
  2. Labor Board v. Mackay Co.

    304 U.S. 333 (1938)   Cited 535 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer may replace striking workers with others to carry on business so long as the employer is not guilty of unfair labor practices
  3. Drivers Union v. Meadowmoor Co.

    312 U.S. 287 (1941)   Cited 382 times
    Holding an injunction banning picketing was "justified only by the violence that induced it and only so long as it counteracts a continuing intimidation"
  4. Hughes v. Superior Court

    339 U.S. 460 (1950)   Cited 285 times
    In Hughes v. Superior Court, 339 U.S. 460, the Court held that the Fourteenth Amendment did not bar use of the injunction to prohibit picketing of a place of business solely to secure compliance with a demand that its employees be hired in percentage to the racial origin of its customers.
  5. Labor Board v. Link-Belt Co.

    311 U.S. 584 (1941)   Cited 338 times
    Finding a violation of the Act when a supervisor mistakenly believed an employee was involved with the union and discharged him "because of his alleged union activities"
  6. Sola Electric Co. v. Jefferson Electric Co.

    317 U.S. 173 (1942)   Cited 304 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that local laws of estoppel are not applicable where the defense asserted in a diversity contract action is based on federal law
  7. I.A. of M. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 72 (1940)   Cited 317 times
    In International Ass'n of Machinists v. N.L.R.B., 1940, 311 U.S. 72, 61 S.Ct. 83, 85 L. Ed. 50, there had been a long history of management favoritism to the established and hostility to the aspiring union; and in Franks Bros. Co. v. N.L.R.B., 1944, 321 U.S. 702, 703, 64 S.Ct. 817, 818, 88 L.Ed. 1020, the employer had "conducted an aggressive campaign against the Union, even to the extent of threatening to close its factory if the union won the election."
  8. Bethlehem Co. v. State Board

    330 U.S. 767 (1947)   Cited 255 times
    Holding federal nonregulation was not an "administrative concession that the nature of these appellants’ business put" the particular subject matter "beyond reach of federal authority"
  9. Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    321 U.S. 678 (1944)   Cited 270 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that offers of benefits to union supporters that induce them to leave the union violate § 8
  10. Labor Board v. Fansteel Corp.

    306 U.S. 240 (1939)   Cited 281 times
    In Fansteel, the Board awarded reinstatement with backpay to employees who engaged in a "sit down strike" that led to confrontation with local law enforcement officials.
  11. Section 161-F:2 - Department of Health and Human Services

    N.H. Rev. Stat. § 161-F:2

    The department of health and human services established under RSA 126-A:4 shall be responsible for the administration of this chapter. RSA 161-F:2 1989, 7:1. 1995, 310:12, eff. Nov. 1, 1995.