§

H. M. Parker & Son

179 N.L.R.B. 540 (N.L.R.B. 1969)
H. M. Parker & Son

4 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Parts Co.

    375 U.S. 405 (1964)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

  2. Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    362 F.2d 466 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 56 times
    Upholding Board's determination that discharge for insubordination was pretextual where employer "refused to discharge" another employee also accused of insubordination

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ace Comb Co.

    342 F.2d 841 (8th Cir. 1965)   Cited 32 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Ace Comb Co., 342 F.2d 841 (8th Cir. 1965) and N.L.R.B. v. Bird Machine Co., 161 F.2d 589 (1st Cir. 1947), where instructions to supervisory employees not to make coercive statements did not relieve employer of imputed liability it is indicated that it might be otherwise if these instructions had been communicated to the employees.

  4. Steel Industries, Incorporated v. N.L.R.B

    325 F.2d 173 (7th Cir. 1963)   Cited 8 times

    No. 13975. November 27, 1963. As Corrected November 27, 1963. Charles L. Whistler, Indianapolis, Ind., Joseph B. Carney, Indianapolis, Ind., Baker Daniels, Indianapolis, Ind., of counsel, for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Jules H. Gordon, Attorney, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Lee Modjeska, Attorney, N.L.R.B., for respondent. Before HASTINGS, Chief Judge, and DUFFY and MAJOR, Circuit Judges. MAJOR