§

H. Lundbeck A/S

No. 76268930 (T.T.A.B. Mar. 26, 2004)
H. Lundbeck A/S

7 Cited authorities

  1. In re Etablissements Darty Et Fils

    759 F.2d 15 (Fed. Cir. 1985)   Cited 8 times
    In Darty et Fils, however, even though, the primary question was whether "Darty" was primarily merely a surname, the Board had correctly held that the Opposers’ "provides no support for their contention."

  2. Application of I. Lewis Cigar Mfg. Co.

    205 F.2d 204 (C.C.P.A. 1953)   Cited 2 times

    Patent Appeals No. 5943. June 24, 1953. Hauff Warland and James M. Mason, New York City, for appellant. E.L. Reynolds, Washington, D.C. (H.S. Miller, Washington, D.C., of counsel), for the Commissioner of Patents. Before GARRETT, Chief Judge, and O'CONNELL, JOHNSON, WORLEY, and COLE, Judges. WORLEY, Judge. This is an appeal from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents affirming the rejection by the examiner of the application for registration filed December 5, 1947, under the provisions of section

  3. Sears, Roebuck Co. v. Watson

    204 F.2d 32 (D.C. Cir. 1953)   Cited 1 times

    No. 11454. Argued January 27, 1953. Decided March 12, 1953. Mr. C. Willard Hayes, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Frank H. Marks, Chicago, Ill., was on the brief, for appellant. Mr. Joseph Schimmel, Atty., U.S. Patent Office, with whom Mr. E.L. Reynolds, Sol., U.S. Patent Office, was on the brief, for appellee. Before PROCTOR, FAHY and WASHINGTON, Circuit Judges. FAHY, Circuit Judge. Sears, Roebuck and Co., the appellant, in 1908 adopted as a trade-mark for sporting goods "J C Higgins", not written

  4. Section 1051 - Application for registration; verification

    15 U.S.C. § 1051   Cited 3,886 times   126 Legal Analyses
    Requiring a filing of a Statement of Use to register a mark

  5. Section 1052 - Trademarks registrable on principal register; concurrent registration

    15 U.S.C. § 1052   Cited 1,600 times   274 Legal Analyses
    Granting authority to refuse registration to a trademark that so resembles a registered mark "as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods of the applicant, to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive"

  6. Section 1126 - International conventions

    15 U.S.C. § 1126   Cited 185 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Stating that an application under § 44 "must state the applicant's bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce, but use in commerce shall not be required prior to registration"

  7. Section 2.142 - Time and manner of ex parte appeals

    37 C.F.R. § 2.142   Cited 3 times   1 Legal Analyses

    (a) (1) An appeal filed under the provisions of § 2.141(a) from the final refusal of an application must be filed within the time provided in § 2.62(a) . (2) An appeal filed under the provisions of § 2.141(b) from an expungement or reexamination proceeding must be filed within three months from the issue date of the final Office action. (3) An appeal is taken by filing a notice of appeal, as prescribed in § 2.126 , and paying the appeal fee. (b) (1) The brief of appellant shall be filed within sixty