H & H Pretzel Co.
2 Cited authorities
Labor Board v. Truitt Mfg. Co.
351 U.S. 149 (1956) Cited 223 times 8 Legal AnalysesHolding that the duty to produce information relevant to a bargaining issue is derivative from the broader statutory duty to bargain in good-faith
Dailey v. Lipman, Wolfe Co.
88 F.2d 362 (9th Cir. 1937) Cited 4 timesNo. 8118. February 15, 1937. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Oregon; John H. McNary, Judge. Patent infringement suit by William O. Dailey against Lipman, Wolfe Co. From an adverse decree, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed. Samuel S. Jacobson and Jaureguy Tooze, all of Portland, Or., for appellant. Clarence E. Threedy of Chicago, Ill., and Dey, Hampson Nelson, of Portland, Or., for appellee. Before GARRECHT, DENMAN, and HANEY, Circuit Judges. HANEY, Circuit Judge