§

Gurabo Lace Mills, Inc.

265 N.L.R.B. 355 (N.L.R.B. 1982)
Gurabo Lace Mills, Inc.

4 Cited authorities

  1. Amalgamated Clothing Wkrs. of Am. v. N.L.R.B

    365 F.2d 898 (D.C. Cir. 1966)   Cited 63 times

    Nos. 19452, 19515. Argued January 10, 1966. Decided June 27, 1966. Mr. Joel Field, New York City, of the bar of the Court of Appeals of New York, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Mr. Jacob Sheinkman, New York City, was on the brief, for petitioner in No. 19452. Mr. Warren M. Davison, Atty., N.L.R.B., with whom Messrs. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, were on the brief, for petitioner in No. 19515

  2. NATIONAL LABOR REL. BD. v. BETTER MONKEY GRIP

    243 F.2d 836 (5th Cir. 1957)   Cited 14 times

    No. 16278. May 1, 1957. Rehearing Denied May 29, 1957. Owsley Vose, Stephen Leonard, Washington, D.C., Theophil C. Kammholz, General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Assistant General Counsel, Ruth V. Reel, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Herbert S. Bonney, Jr., William L. Keller, Dallas, Tex., for respondent. Before BORAH, RIVES and BROWN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. The National Labor Relations Board, pursuant to Sec. 10(e) of the National Labor Relations

  3. Don Swart Trucking Co. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    359 F.2d 428 (4th Cir. 1966)

    No. 10274. Argued April 4, 1966. Decided April 8, 1966. Carl B. Galbraith, Wheeling, W. Va. (George H. Seibert, Jr., and Ronald W. Kasserman, Wheeling, W. Va., on brief), for petitioner. Robert A. Giannasi, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and George B. Driesen, Atty., N.L.R.B., on brief), for respondent. Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, J. SPENCER BELL, Circuit Judge, and BUTZNER, District Judge. PER

  4. Burton v. McDermott

    365 P.2d 891 (Colo. 1961)   Cited 1 times

    No. 19,742. Decided November 6, 1961. Rehearing denied November 20, 1961. Action for damages resulting from intersectional collision. Judgment for defendants. Affirmed. 1. AUTOMOBILES — Collision — Negligence — Last Clear Chance — Instruction. Before plaintiff is entitled to an instruction on last clear chance in an automobile collision case, there must be evidence to show more than a mere possibility of avoiding the accident; such evidence must show that defendant has a clear chance to avoid the