Holding that the remedy provided in §§ 515 and 502(g) "is limited to the collection of `promised contributions' and does not confer jurisdiction on district courts to determine whether an employer's unilateral decision to refuse to make post-contract contributions constitutes a violation of the NLRA."
388 U.S. 26 (1967) Cited 322 times 8 Legal Analyses
Holding that substantial evidence supported the Board's finding of discriminatory conduct as the Company failed to meet its burden of establishing legitimate motives for its conduct
Holding that employer may not terminate worker's disability benefits when he publicly supports a strike because disabled employee cannot withhold employment services
In NLRB v. Preston H. Haskell Co., 616 F.2d 136 (5th Cir. 1980), the panel filed three separate opinions, and two of those opinions expressly reject the argument Dependable makes here.