§

Grumman Allied Industries, Inc.

220 N.L.R.B. 756 (N.L.R.B. 1975)
Grumman Allied Industries, Inc.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Lawlor v. Nat'l Screen Serv.

    349 U.S. 322 (1955)   Cited 889 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that two suits were not "based on the same cause of action," because "[t]he conduct presently complained of was all subsequent to" the prior judgment and it "cannot be given the effect of extinguishing claims which did not even then exist and which could not possibly have been sued upon in the previous case"

  2. Labor Board v. Donnelly Co.

    330 U.S. 219 (1947)   Cited 128 times
    Holding that a hearing examiner's prior adverse ruling did not prevent him from adjudicating the same case on retrial even though the examiner's initial decision had been reversed for improper exclusion of evidence

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Brown Root, Inc.

    311 F.2d 447 (8th Cir. 1963)   Cited 71 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Brown Root, Inc., 311 F.2d 447, 454 (C.A. 8), it is said that "in a back pay proceeding the burden is upon the General Counsel to show the gross amounts of back pay due.

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Olson Bodies, Inc.

    420 F.2d 1187 (2d Cir. 1970)   Cited 29 times
    In NLRB v. Olson Bodies, Inc., 420 F.2d 1187, 1189 (2d Cir. 1970) (Friendly, J.), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 954, 91 S.Ct. 966, 28 L.Ed.2d 237 (1971), this court stated: "The conduct of representation elections is the very archetype of a purely administrative function, with no quasi about it, concerning which courts should not interfere save for the most glaring discrimination or abuse.

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Interurban Gas Company

    354 F.2d 76 (6th Cir. 1965)   Cited 8 times

    No. 14961. December 22, 1965. Thomas Canafax, Jr., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief, for petitioner. Charles Keller, Detroit, Mich., Leonard A. Keller, James E. Frazer, Frazer Popkin, Detroit, Mich., on brief, for respondent. Before PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge, CECIL, Senior Circuit Judge, and MACHROWICZ, District Judge. Honorable

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Biscayne Television Corporation

    337 F.2d 267 (5th Cir. 1964)   Cited 9 times

    No. 18452. October 12, 1964. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Melvin Pollack, Atty., Washington, D.C., Harold A. Boire, Director, Tampa, Fla., for petitioner. Jerry B. Crockett, Miami, Fla., for respondent. Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, BELL, Circuit Judge, and WHITEHURST, District Judge. PER CURIAM. This case is before the court on a petition by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of its supplemental order issued upon the remand

  7. United Steelworkers, Afl-Cio v. N.L.R.B

    436 F.2d 908 (D.C. Cir. 1970)   Cited 2 times

    Nos. 23772, 23853. Argued October 27, 1970. Decided November 18, 1970. Petition for Rehearing Denied January 18, 1971. Mr. George Cohen, Washington, D.C., for petitioner in No. 23,772. Messrs. Jay A. Darwin, San Francisco, Cal., and Michael H. Gottesman, Washington, D.C., were on the brief for petitioner in No 23,772. Mr. Gregory A. Harrison, San Francisco, Cal., with whom Mr. Donald Dennis Connors, Jr., San Francisco, Cal., was on the brief, for petitioner in No. 23,853. Mr. Frank H. Itkin, Atty

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Flora Construction Company

    354 F.2d 107 (10th Cir. 1965)   Cited 2 times

    No. 6884. December 9, 1965. Morton Namrow, Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, and Glen M. Bendixsen, Washington, D.C., with him on brief), for petitioner. Mildred Flora, pro se, for respondents. Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and LEWIS and SETH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. When this case was here (10 Cir., 311 F.2d 310) for enforcement of the Board's decision, we sustained its findings that the respondent had discriminatorily discharged seven named employees