Groves Truck & Trailer

18 Cited authorities

Golden State Bottling Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
414 U.S. 168 (1973) Cited 497 times 20 Legal Analyses
Holding that Rule 65(d) allows enforcement of orders against successors of enjoined parties
Penntech Papers, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
706 F.2d 18 (1st Cir. 1983) Cited 121 times
Holding that same day notice was inadequate where company failed to bargain in good faith after the closure
Soule Glass and Glazing Co. v. N.L.R.B
652 F.2d 1055 (1st Cir. 1981) Cited 97 times
Holding that the employer "must bargain with respect to the decision to remove work from bargaining unit employees, not merely its effects on the employees"
N.L.R.B. v. Don Burgess Const. Corp.
596 F.2d 378 (9th Cir. 1979) Cited 101 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that section 10(b) limitations period begins to run when the employee "discovers, or in the exercise of reasonable diligence should have discovered, the acts constituting the alleged [violation]"
N.L.R.B. v. Allcoast Transfer, Inc.
780 F.2d 576 (6th Cir. 1986) Cited 74 times
Finding that a new corporation formed by the split of an employer's moving and storage business into two entities was the alter ego of the employer and, therefore, bound by its collective bargaining obligations
Goodman Piping Products, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
741 F.2d 10 (2d Cir. 1984) Cited 76 times 1 Legal Analyses
Finding common ownership when the predecessor was corporation wholly owned by the husband and the successor corporation by the wife
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Al Bryant, Inc.
711 F.2d 543 (3d Cir. 1983) Cited 62 times
Finding that "the frequent interchange of craftsman" between the two companies is "substantial evidence to support" centralized labor relations control
N.L.R.B. v. Better Bldg. Supply Corp.
837 F.2d 377 (9th Cir. 1988) Cited 37 times
Giving no deference to Board's interpretation of bankruptcy law
N.L.R.B. v. Brown Root, Inc.
311 F.2d 447 (8th Cir. 1963) Cited 71 times
In N.L.R.B. v. Brown Root, Inc., 311 F.2d 447, 454 (C.A. 8), it is said that "in a back pay proceeding the burden is upon the General Counsel to show the gross amounts of back pay due.
Premium Foods, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
709 F.2d 623 (9th Cir. 1983) Cited 31 times
Holding that employees' requests for withdrawal cards, even if such requests indicated that the employees no longer wished to be members of the union, did “not necessarily indicate that [they] no longer wish to be represented by it”

Groves Truck & Trailer

18 Cited authorities

Holding that Rule 65(d) allows enforcement of orders against successors of enjoined parties

Holding that same day notice was inadequate where company failed to bargain in good faith after the closure

Holding that the employer "must bargain with respect to the decision to remove work from bargaining unit employees, not merely its effects on the employees"

Holding that section 10(b) limitations period begins to run when the employee "discovers, or in the exercise of reasonable diligence should have discovered, the acts constituting the alleged [violation]"

Finding that a new corporation formed by the split of an employer's moving and storage business into two entities was the alter ego of the employer and, therefore, bound by its collective bargaining obligations

Finding common ownership when the predecessor was corporation wholly owned by the husband and the successor corporation by the wife

Finding that "the frequent interchange of craftsman" between the two companies is "substantial evidence to support" centralized labor relations control

Giving no deference to Board's interpretation of bankruptcy law

In N.L.R.B. v. Brown Root, Inc., 311 F.2d 447, 454 (C.A. 8), it is said that "in a back pay proceeding the burden is upon the General Counsel to show the gross amounts of back pay due.

Holding that employees' requests for withdrawal cards, even if such requests indicated that the employees no longer wished to be members of the union, did “not necessarily indicate that [they] no longer wish to be represented by it”