Groves Truck And Trailer

14 Cited authorities

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.
395 U.S. 575 (1969) Cited 1,036 times 71 Legal Analyses
Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"
Labor Board v. Parts Co.
375 U.S. 405 (1964) Cited 213 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”
N.L.R.B. v. Haberman Const. Co.
641 F.2d 351 (5th Cir. 1981) Cited 103 times
Holding that the employer "manifested an intent to abide by the . . . contract by enjoying its benefits and abiding by its provisions"
Alexander Dawson, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
586 F.2d 1300 (9th Cir. 1978) Cited 40 times
Holding "the content of a document, when considered with the circumstances surrounding its discovery, is an adequate basis for [its authentication]"
N.L.R.B. v. Security Guard Service, Inc.
384 F.2d 143 (5th Cir. 1967) Cited 53 times 1 Legal Analyses
Recognizing "the standard reluctance to apply [a statutory] exception broadly"
Pay'n Save Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
641 F.2d 697 (9th Cir. 1981) Cited 22 times
Noting that concerns about employee dissension can be a special circumstance
Frito-Lay, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
585 F.2d 62 (3d Cir. 1978) Cited 23 times
Reopening of uneconomic plant would cost one million dollars plus operating loss of several hundred thousand dollars a year
Ohio Power Co. v. N.L.R.B
176 F.2d 385 (6th Cir. 1949) Cited 64 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that plain and unambiguous text must be applied as written without resort to construction
N.L.R.B. v. Magnesium Casting Company
427 F.2d 114 (1st Cir. 1970) Cited 26 times
No. 7462. May 21, 1970. Abigail Cooley Baskir, Washington, D.C., Attorney, with whom Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Marshall F. Berman, Washington, D.C., Attorney, were on the brief, for petitioner. Jerome H. Somers, Boston, Mass., with whom Louis Chandler and Stoneman Chandler, Boston, Mass., were on the brief, for respondent. Before ALDRICH, Chief Judge, COFFIN, Circuit Judge, and BOWNES, District Judge. COFFIN
Majestic Molded Products, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
330 F.2d 603 (2d Cir. 1964) Cited 26 times
In Majestic Molded Products, Inc., v. N.L.R.B., (2 Cir. 1964) 330 F.2d 603, 606, the layoffs were also in order of seniority.

Groves Truck And Trailer

14 Cited authorities

Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

Holding that the employer "manifested an intent to abide by the . . . contract by enjoying its benefits and abiding by its provisions"

Holding "the content of a document, when considered with the circumstances surrounding its discovery, is an adequate basis for [its authentication]"

Recognizing "the standard reluctance to apply [a statutory] exception broadly"

Noting that concerns about employee dissension can be a special circumstance

Reopening of uneconomic plant would cost one million dollars plus operating loss of several hundred thousand dollars a year

Holding that plain and unambiguous text must be applied as written without resort to construction

In Majestic Molded Products, Inc., v. N.L.R.B., (2 Cir. 1964) 330 F.2d 603, 606, the layoffs were also in order of seniority.