Grinnell Corp.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Chemical Workers v. Pittsburgh Glass

    404 U.S. 157 (1971)   Cited 632 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding retirees are not "employees" within the bargaining unit
  2. Labor Board v. Insurance Agents

    361 U.S. 477 (1960)   Cited 325 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, subject to the duty to bargain in good faith, "parties should have wide latitude in their negotiations"
  3. Labor Board v. American Ins. Co.

    343 U.S. 395 (1952)   Cited 269 times
    Holding the degree of discretion in a CBA "is an issue for determination across the bargaining table, not by the Board"
  4. Labor Board v. Truitt Mfg. Co.

    351 U.S. 149 (1956)   Cited 223 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the duty to produce information relevant to a bargaining issue is derivative from the broader statutory duty to bargain in good-faith
  5. Kankakee-Iroquois Cty. Employers' v. N.L.R.B

    825 F.2d 1091 (7th Cir. 1987)   Cited 15 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 86-1627. Argued December 11, 1986. Decided June 19, 1987. Karl W. Grabemann, McDermott, Will Emery, Chicago, Ill., for petitioner. John Burgoyne, Elliott Moore, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., William A. Widmer, III, Carmell, Charone, Widmer Mathews, Ltd., Chicago, Ill., for respondents. Petition from the National Labor Relations Board. Before BAUER, Chief Judge, COFFEY and EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judges. COFFEY, Circuit Judge. On appeal, petitioner Kankakee-Iroquois County Employers' Association ("KICEA")

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Master Slack

    618 F.2d 6 (6th Cir. 1980)   Cited 5 times

    No. 77-1641. March 20, 1980. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate General Counsel, N.L.R.B., Jay Shanklin, Mary Schuette, Washington, D.C., Raymond A. Jacobson, Director Region 26, N.L.R.B., Memphis, Tenn., for petitioner. Yelverton Cowherd, W. Kirby Bowling, Bowling Jackson, Memphis, Tenn., for respondents. Before KENNEDY, MARTIN and JONES, Circuit Judges. ORDER The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) petitions for enforcement of its decision and order, which found violations of Sections 8(a)(1), (3)