Greyhound Lines, Inc.

6 Cited authorities

Sears, Roebuck Co. v. Carpenters
436 U.S. 180 (1978) Cited 554 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that both state and federal courts must defer to the National Labor Relations Board when an activity is arguably protected under § 7 or prohibited by § 8 of the NLRA
Hudgens v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
424 U.S. 507 (1976) Cited 543 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding picketers "did not have a First Amendment right to enter [a privately owned] shopping center for the purpose of advertising their strike"
Lloyd Corp. v. Tanner
407 U.S. 551 (1972) Cited 466 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that a private shopping center did not violate the First Amendment by prohibiting the distribution of handbills on its property
Hughes v. Superior Court
339 U.S. 460 (1950) Cited 285 times
In Hughes v. Superior Court, 339 U.S. 460, the Court held that the Fourteenth Amendment did not bar use of the injunction to prohibit picketing of a place of business solely to secure compliance with a demand that its employees be hired in percentage to the racial origin of its customers.
Giant Food Markets, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
633 F.2d 18 (6th Cir. 1980) Cited 13 times
Observing that generally it will be easier to communicate with a specific number of discrete employees than with potential customers of a large retail store
Seattle-First Nat. Bank v. N.L.R.B
651 F.2d 1272 (9th Cir. 1980) Cited 4 times
In Seattle-First National Bank v. NLRB, 651 F.2d 1272 (9th Cir. 1980), the picketing site was an area outside the entrance to a large restaurant located on the forty-sixth floor of an office building.

Greyhound Lines, Inc.

6 Cited authorities

Sears, Roebuck Co. v. Carpenters

Holding that both state and federal courts must defer to the National Labor Relations Board when an activity is arguably protected under § 7 or prohibited by § 8 of the NLRA

Hudgens v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

Holding picketers "did not have a First Amendment right to enter [a privately owned] shopping center for the purpose of advertising their strike"

Lloyd Corp. v. Tanner

Holding that a private shopping center did not violate the First Amendment by prohibiting the distribution of handbills on its property

Hughes v. Superior Court

In Hughes v. Superior Court, 339 U.S. 460, the Court held that the Fourteenth Amendment did not bar use of the injunction to prohibit picketing of a place of business solely to secure compliance with a demand that its employees be hired in percentage to the racial origin of its customers.

Giant Food Markets, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

Observing that generally it will be easier to communicate with a specific number of discrete employees than with potential customers of a large retail store

Seattle-First Nat. Bank v. N.L.R.B

In Seattle-First National Bank v. NLRB, 651 F.2d 1272 (9th Cir. 1980), the picketing site was an area outside the entrance to a large restaurant located on the forty-sixth floor of an office building.