§

Grenada Stamping & Assembly, Inc.

351 N.L.R.B. 1152 (N.L.R.B. 2007)
Grenada Stamping & Assembly, Inc.

13 Cited authorities

  1. Allentown Mack Sales & Service, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    522 U.S. 359 (1998)   Cited 419 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Board "is not free to prescribe what inferences from the evidence it will accept and reject, but must draw all those inferences that the evidence fairly demands"

  2. Fall River Dyeing & Finishing Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    482 U.S. 27 (1987)   Cited 365 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the new employer must bargain with the old union, if the new employer is a true successor, and discussing factors

  3. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 705 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.

    406 U.S. 272 (1972)   Cited 478 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a successor is not bound to substantive terms of previous collective bargaining agreement

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

    385 U.S. 432 (1967)   Cited 262 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Approving "discovery-type standard"

  6. Frazier Industrial Co., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    213 F.3d 750 (D.C. Cir. 2000)   Cited 15 times
    Finding that employment application which stated that “false information, omissions, or misrepresentations may result in a discharge of the employee” was insufficient to establish that the plaintiff would have been discharged for conduct at issue, and that company policy manual specifying that falsification of records would warrant immediate dismissal was immaterial where manual had not been distributed to employee prior to employee's termination

  7. Texas Petrochemicals Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    923 F.2d 398 (5th Cir. 1991)   Cited 19 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Describing the duty of the employer to rebut the presumption of majority status by conducting a poll in accordance with the required procedural safeguards

  8. Peters v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    153 F.3d 289 (6th Cir. 1998)   Cited 9 times
    Granting the Board "latitude" in "interpreting its own rules"

  9. Crowley Marine Services, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    234 F.3d 1295 (D.C. Cir. 2000)   Cited 6 times
    Upholding the Board’s finding of a violation where "the information was sought and needed to enable the Union to make an informed judgment" about pursuing contract violation remedies

  10. Thomas Industries, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    687 F.2d 863 (6th Cir. 1982)   Cited 16 times
    In Thomas Industries, 687 F.2d at 869, this Court, in finding that a poll satisfied the procedural requirements set forth in Struksnes, relied in part on the fact that the union president was present, and spoke to employees before they voted.