Gregg, Gibson, & Gregg

58 Cited authorities

Pittsburgh Glass Co. v. Board
313 U.S. 146 (1941) Cited 294 times
In Pittsburgh Glass, the Court held that it was not a denial of due process for the Board to refuse to consider evidence relating to the certification issue when petitioner first sought to introduce such evidence at the unfair labor practice hearing.
Japan Line v. Sabre Shipping Corp.
395 U.S. 922 (1969) Cited 96 times
No. 1263. May 26, 1969. C.A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Philip A. Ryan for Japan Line, Ltd., et al., and A. Vernon Carnahan for Maritime Co. of the Philippines, petitioners. Leon Silverman for respondent. Reported below: 407 P. 2d 173.
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Golden Age Beverage Co.
415 F.2d 26 (5th Cir. 1969) Cited 95 times
In NLRB v. Golden Age Beverage Company, 415 F.2d 26, 30 (5th Cir. 1969), this court apparently considered hearsay evidence at this stage of proceedings to set aside an election.
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Tennessee Packers, Inc.
379 F.2d 172 (6th Cir. 1967) Cited 77 times
Hearing on objections is required only if substantial factual questions are raised by objections
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bata Shoe Co.
377 F.2d 821 (4th Cir. 1967) Cited 65 times
In NLRB v. Bata Shoe Co., 377 F.2d 821 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 917, 88 S.Ct. 238, 19 L.Ed.2d 265 (1967), upon which Randall relies, the employer presented specific evidence of more severe procedural irregularities that demonstrably affected the election results.
N.L.R.B. v. Air Ctrl. Prod. of St. Petersburg
335 F.2d 245 (5th Cir. 1964) Cited 54 times
No. 21017. July 28, 1964. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Lawrence Gold, Atty., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Stephen B. Goldberg, Paula Omansky, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Harrison C. Thompson, Jr., Shackleford, Farrior, Stallings, Glos Evans, Tampa, Fla., for respondent. Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, BROWN, Circuit Judge, and BREWSTER, District Judge. JOHN R. BROWN, Circuit Judge. This is another § 8(a)(5), 29
N.L.R.B. v. O.K. Van Storage, Inc.
297 F.2d 74 (5th Cir. 1961) Cited 50 times
In NLRB v. O.K. Van Storage, Inc., (5 Cir. 1961) 297 F.2d 74, 76, the necessity for granting a hearing on objections to an election was under consideration.
Amalgamated Clothing Wkrs. of Am. v. N.L.R.B
424 F.2d 818 (D.C. Cir. 1970) Cited 36 times
Affirming Board determination that employer's evidence was not new because "no explanation was offered as to why this evidence was not discovered or could not have been discovered by the exercise of due diligence"
Smith Steel Workers v. A.O. Smith Corporation
420 F.2d 1 (7th Cir. 1969) Cited 34 times
In Smith Steel Workers v. A. O. Smith Corp., 420 F.2d 1 (7th Cir. 1969), the union sought review of a unit classification order of the NLRB and also sought to compel arbitration provided for in the existing collective bargaining agreement with A.O. Smith. This circuit ruled that the district court was correct in dismissing the union's complaint based upon Carey.
State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co. v. N.L.R.B
411 F.2d 356 (7th Cir. 1969) Cited 32 times
In State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. NLRB, 411 F.2d 356, 358 (7th Cir. 1969) (en banc), this court in upholding a Board's unit determination, held that "the Board's determination will not be overturned unless it is arbitrary or unreasonable."
Section 159 - Representatives and elections
29 U.S.C. § 159 Cited 2,441 times 12 Legal Analyses
Granting a bargaining unit the exclusive right to represent employees in it

Gregg, Gibson, & Gregg

58 Cited authorities

In Pittsburgh Glass, the Court held that it was not a denial of due process for the Board to refuse to consider evidence relating to the certification issue when petitioner first sought to introduce such evidence at the unfair labor practice hearing.

In NLRB v. Golden Age Beverage Company, 415 F.2d 26, 30 (5th Cir. 1969), this court apparently considered hearsay evidence at this stage of proceedings to set aside an election.

Hearing on objections is required only if substantial factual questions are raised by objections

In NLRB v. Bata Shoe Co., 377 F.2d 821 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 917, 88 S.Ct. 238, 19 L.Ed.2d 265 (1967), upon which Randall relies, the employer presented specific evidence of more severe procedural irregularities that demonstrably affected the election results.

In NLRB v. O.K. Van Storage, Inc., (5 Cir. 1961) 297 F.2d 74, 76, the necessity for granting a hearing on objections to an election was under consideration.

Affirming Board determination that employer's evidence was not new because "no explanation was offered as to why this evidence was not discovered or could not have been discovered by the exercise of due diligence"

In State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. NLRB, 411 F.2d 356, 358 (7th Cir. 1969) (en banc), this court in upholding a Board's unit determination, held that "the Board's determination will not be overturned unless it is arbitrary or unreasonable."

Granting a bargaining unit the exclusive right to represent employees in it