§

Greenville Shipbuilding, Inc.

165 N.L.R.B. 891 (N.L.R.B. 1967)
Greenville Shipbuilding, Inc.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Electrical Workers v. Labor Board

    341 U.S. 694 (1951)   Cited 246 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the prohibition of picketing in furtherance of unlawful objectives is not an abridgement of free speech

  2. Labor Board v. Virginia Power Co.

    314 U.S. 469 (1941)   Cited 169 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In NLRB v. Virginia Electric Power Co., 314 U.S. 469, 477, 62 S.Ct. 344, 348, 86 L.Ed. 348 (1941), the Supreme court concluded that the Wagner Act could not be interpreted to prohibit an employer from exercising his First Amendment right to express his views to employees on the merits of unionization, provided the expression was neither coercive nor part of a coercive course of conduct.

  3. Hendrix Manufacturing Company v. N.L.R.B

    321 F.2d 100 (5th Cir. 1963)   Cited 91 times
    Permitting the Board to consider the employer's clear expression of opposition to the union as background in order to determine motivation for management's conduct

  4. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Federbush Co.

    121 F.2d 954 (2d Cir. 1941)   Cited 85 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Federbush Co., 121 Fed. 2d 954, decided July 18, 1941, the decision of the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit was written by Judge Learned Hand.

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Marsh Supermarkets, Inc.

    327 F.2d 109 (7th Cir. 1963)   Cited 22 times
    Affirming Board finding of coercive interrogation where officials threatened that "if a union got in," then "everything would be wiped clean"

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bailey Co.

    180 F.2d 278 (6th Cir. 1950)   Cited 23 times

    No. 10883. February 13, 1950. Frederick U. Reel, Washington, D.C., David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers, Frederick U. Reel, and Albert Gore, Washington, D.C., on brief, for petitioner. Eugene B. Schwartz, Cleveland, Ohio, Welles K. Stanley, Eugene B. Schwartz, Carl H. Clark, Cleveland, Ohio, on brief; Stanley, Smoyer Schwartz, Cleveland, Ohio, of counsel for respondent. Before ALLEN, McALLISTER, and MILLER, Circuit Judges. McALLISTER, Circuit Judge. This is a petition for enforcement of an order of