§

Greco & Haines, Inc.

306 N.L.R.B. 634 (N.L.R.B. 1992)
Greco & Haines, Inc.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Walton Mfg. Co.

    369 U.S. 404 (1962)   Cited 298 times
    Explaining that the deferential standard of review is appropriate because the "[the ALJ] ... sees the witnesses and hears them testify, while the Board and the reviewing court look only at cold records"

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  3. Abbey's Transp. Services, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    837 F.2d 575 (2d Cir. 1988)   Cited 25 times
    Finding violation when interrogator was a "lawyer-consultant"

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Long Island Airport Limousine Serv

    468 F.2d 292 (2d Cir. 1972)   Cited 26 times
    Affirming NLRB finding of Section 8 violation where discharged employee, who was “union ‘spearhead’ for organizing the [c]ompany's drivers,” had been soliciting union support on day before abrupt discharge, and employer's asserted reasons that employee had poor employment record, had received traffic tickets, and submitted incomplete paperwork—including “a particularly serious incident ... that involved missing cash collections” for which he was warned—were contradictory and pretextual, and where treatment of other employees for similar misconduct was disparate

  5. Holo-Krome Co. v. N.L.R.B

    947 F.2d 588 (2d Cir. 1991)   Cited 3 times

    Nos. 163, 322, Dockets 91-4061, 91-4085. Argued September 11, 1991. Decided October 15, 1991. Opinion on Denial of Rehearing Filed January 17, 1992. Burton Kainen, Hartford, Conn. (Diana Garfield, Siegel, O'Connor, Schiff, Zangari Kainen, P.C., on the brief), for petitioner-cross-respondent. Marilyn O'Rourke, Washington, D.C. (Jerry M. Hunter, Gen. Counsel, D. Randall Frye, Acting Deputy Gen. Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, and William R. Stewart, Deputy Asst. Gen. Counsel

  6. Rule 803 - Exceptions to the Rule Against Hearsay-Regardless of Whether the Declarant Is Available as a Witness

    Fed. R. Evid. 803   Cited 12,975 times   85 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing exception to rule against hearsay for records of regularly conducted activities