§

Great Plains Steel Corp.

183 N.L.R.B. 968 (N.L.R.B. 1970)
Great Plains Steel Corp.

11 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Labor Board v. Express Pub. Co.

    312 U.S. 426 (1941)   Cited 506 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the mere fact that a court has found that a defendant has committed an act in violation of a statute does not justify an injunction broadly to obey the statute"

  3. Labor Board v. Parts Co.

    375 U.S. 405 (1964)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fant Milling Co.

    360 U.S. 301 (1959)   Cited 106 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an untimely allegation of an unlawful unilateral wage increase was sufficiently related to a timely refusal-to-bargain charge, because the wage increase "largely influenced" the Board's finding that an unlawful refusal to bargain had occurred

  5. Texas Industries, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    336 F.2d 128 (5th Cir. 1964)   Cited 64 times
    In Texas Industries, Inc. v. N.L.R.B., 336 F.2d 128 (5 Cir. 1964), the court held that charges filed by the Union that alleged generally that the company had "engaged in * * * unfair labor practices within the meaning of" Section 8(a)(1) and (3), and then alleged specifically various acts of coercion against a named employee was sufficient to include unfair labor practices by the company against other employees which were not mentioned in the charges.

  6. Indiana Metal Products v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    202 F.2d 613 (7th Cir. 1953)   Cited 48 times

    No. 10717. March 10, 1953. Edward J. Fahy and Shultz Fahy, Rockford, Ill., for petitioner. David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Atty. National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel and Ruth V. Reel, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before DUFFY, FINNEGAN and LINDLEY, Circuit Judges. DUFFY, Circuit Judge. This is a petition by the Indiana Metal Products Corporation

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Neuhoff Bros., Packers, Inc.

    375 F.2d 372 (5th Cir. 1967)   Cited 21 times

    No. 23330. March 23, 1967. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Janet A. Kohn, Atty., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, George B. Driesen, Karen W. Ferguson, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for appellant. Fritz L. Lyne, Erich F. Klein, Jr., Lyne, Klein French, Dallas, Tex., for appellee. Before BROWN, COLEMAN and AINSWORTH, Circuit Judges. JOHN R. BROWN, Circuit Judge. The Board petitions for enforcement of its Order holding that the Employer violated

  8. North American Rockwell Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    389 F.2d 866 (10th Cir. 1968)   Cited 17 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 9428. February 14, 1968. Sharp Whitmore and Stephen E. Tallent, Los Angeles, Cal. (Jan Vetter, Los Angeles, Cal., of counsel, was with them on the brief), for petitioner. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Nancy M. Sherman and Vivian Asplund, Attys., National Labor Relations, Board, for respondent. Before HILL and SETH, Circuit Judges, and DOYLE, District Judge. WILLIAM E. DOYLE, District Judge. The case is before the

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Pecheur Lozenge Co.

    209 F.2d 393 (2d Cir. 1953)   Cited 27 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Pecheur Lozenge Co., 2 Cir., 209 F.2d 393, 403, 404, it was held an unfair labor practice to insist that a strike be called off as a condition of bargaining.

  10. Crown Tar & Chemical Works, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    365 F.2d 588 (10th Cir. 1966)   Cited 8 times

    No. 8372. August 26, 1966. John S. Pfeiffer, Denver, Colo. (Isaacson, Rosenbaum, Goldberg Miller, Denver, Colo., on the brief), for petitioner. Melvin H. Reifin, Attorney, NLRB (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, NLRB, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, NLRB, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, NLRB, Solomon I. Hirsch, Attorney, NLRB, on the brief), for respondent. Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and JONES and HICKEY, Circuit Judges. Of the Fifth Circuit, sitting by designation. JONES, Circuit