4 Cited authorities
Clarke v. Storchak
384 Ill. 564 (Ill. 1943) Cited 77 timesIn Clarke v. Storchak (1943), 384 Ill. 564, the "guest statute" (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1941, ch. 95 1/2, par. 58a), attacked as being violative of section 19 of article II, was held to be valid, and in the opinion the court specifically rejected the argument that in creating the requirement that there be proof of willful and wanton misconduct in an action by a guest against his host, when prior to the enactment of the section recovery could be had upon proof of negligence, the statute violated the constitutional provision.
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Thompson Ramo Wooldridge, Inc.
305 F.2d 807 (7th Cir. 1962) Cited 15 timesRefusing to enforce an order that prohibited violations of the statute "in any other manner"
International Ladies' G.W.U. v. N.L.R.B
237 F.2d 545 (D.C. Cir. 1956) Cited 18 timesNos. 12511, 12585. Argued February 3, 1956. Decided May 3, 1956. Mr. Bernard Dunau, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Morris P. Glushien, New York City, was on the brief, for petitioner in case No. 12511. Mr. Samuel H. Jaffee, Washington, D.C., also entered an appearance for petitioner in No. 12511. Mr. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, for respondent in case No. 12511, and petitioner in case No. 12585. Mr. Robert G. Johnson, Attorney, National Labor Relations
National Labor R.B. v. Ellis Watts Products
297 F.2d 576 (6th Cir. 1962) Cited 6 timesNo. 14565. January 15, 1962. Rosanna Blake, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Dominick L. Manoli, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Samuel M. Singer, Herman I. Branse, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Donald E. Calhoun, Cincinnati, Ohio, for respondent. Before MARTIN, WEICK and O'SULLIVAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. The case is before us on petition for enforcement of the Board's order. The Board found that respondent employer had interfered with, restrained and coerced employees