Great Lakes Restaurant Management, LLC

8 Cited authorities

  1. Deposit Guaranty Nat. Bank v. Roper

    445 U.S. 326 (1980)   Cited 999 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Holding that denial of class certification is appealable after entry of final judgment
  2. Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board

    324 U.S. 793 (1945)   Cited 494 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."
  3. Labor Bd. v. Washington Aluminum Co.

    370 U.S. 9 (1962)   Cited 206 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections
  4. D.R. Horton, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    737 F.3d 344 (5th Cir. 2013)   Cited 141 times   145 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an arbitration agreement that prohibited an employee from pursuing claims collectively did not violate the NLRA and must be enforced
  5. Sutherland v. Ernst & Young LLP

    726 F.3d 290 (2d Cir. 2013)   Cited 137 times   40 Legal Analyses
    Holding that class action waivers must be enforced absent a "contrary congressional command"
  6. Murphy Oil United States, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    808 F.3d 1013 (5th Cir. 2015)   Cited 66 times   103 Legal Analyses
    Upholding its earlier holding in D.R. Horton, Inc. v. NLRB , 737 F.3d 344 (5th Cir. 2013), that arbitration provisions mandating individual arbitration of employment-related claims do not violate the NLRA and are enforceable under the FAA
  7. Patterson v. Raymours Furniture Co.

    96 F. Supp. 3d 71 (S.D.N.Y. 2015)   Cited 53 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that arbitration provision in employee handbook was enforceable agreement to arbitrate and that "[i]t is well-settled that revisions to an employee handbook are binding when the employee continues to work after receiving notice of the revisions"
  8. Nanavati v. Adecco USA, Inc.

    99 F. Supp. 3d 1072 (N.D. Cal. 2015)   Cited 21 times
    Finding the defendant's burden to establish the existence of a valid agreement satisfied where the defendant offered a detailed, unopposed declaration establishing that plaintiff did electronically sign the agreement, and the plaintiff did not "challenge the authenticity of his signature or the prima facie validity of the arbitration agreement," nor did the plaintiff offer evidence to suggest that he did not sign the agreement