§

Great Dane Trailers Indiana, Inc

293 N.L.R.B. 384 (N.L.R.B. 1989)
Great Dane Trailers Indiana, Inc

10 Cited authorities

  1. SCM Corp. v. Advance Business Systems & Supply Co.

    397 U.S. 920 (1970)   Cited 200 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Upholding a delay of three months where only prejudice shown was that the defendants could not recall details of the days in the distant past; no special circumstances

  2. Labor Board v. Pittsburgh S.S. Co.

    337 U.S. 656 (1949)   Cited 88 times
    Holding "total rejection of an opposed view cannot of itself impugn the integrity or competence of a trier of fact"

  3. Prill v. N.L.R.B

    755 F.2d 941 (D.C. Cir. 1985)   Cited 80 times   3 Legal Analyses
    In Prill v. NLRB, 755 F.2d 941, 948 (D.C. Cir. 1985), the D.C. Circuit remanded a case to the agency because "a regulation [was] based on an incorrect view of applicable law."

  4. Laidlaw Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    414 F.2d 99 (7th Cir. 1969)   Cited 81 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that while an employer is not obligated to discharge permanent replacements to make room for returning economic strikers, the employer must place the former strikers on a preferential recall list

  5. Prill v. N.L.R.B

    835 F.2d 1481 (D.C. Cir. 1987)   Cited 27 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that an employee takes concerted action “when he acts with the actual participation or on the authority of his co-workers”

  6. Hotel Emp. Restaurant Emp. Un. v. N.L.R.B

    760 F.2d 1006 (9th Cir. 1985)   Cited 26 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Rossmore House, 269 NLRB 1176

  7. American Telephone Telegraph Co v. N.L.R.B

    521 F.2d 1159 (2d Cir. 1975)   Cited 10 times

    Nos. 522, 1174, Dockets 74-1951, 74-2151. Argued May 28, 1975. Decided July 29, 1975. David A. Leff, New York City (Edward Silver, Proskauer, Rose, Goetz Mendelsohn, Philip J. Wessel, New York City, of counsel), for petitioner. Michael S. Winer, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, John S. Irving, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Patrick Hardin, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, John M. Flynn, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., of counsel), for respondent. Petition

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Universal Camera

    179 F.2d 749 (2d Cir. 1950)   Cited 24 times

    No. 54, Docket 21395. Argued December 6, 1949. Decided January 10, 1950. A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ruth Weyand, Asst. Gen. Counsel, William J. Avrutis, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Kaye, Scholer, Fierman Hays, New York City, Frederick R. Livingston, New York City, for respondent. On petition of the National Labor Relations Board for an order, "enforcing" an order of the Board to "cease

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Hicks-Ponder Co.

    458 F.2d 19 (5th Cir. 1972)   Cited 1 times

    No. 71-1930. March 21, 1972. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Michael S. Winer, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., C. Woodrow Greene, Director-Region 28, N.L.R.B., Albuquerque, N.M., Eugene G. Goslee, Acting Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Herman M. Levy, Joseph C. Thackery, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. John Edward Price Associates, Fort Worth, Tex., for respondent. Before GEWIN, AINSWORTH and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: The respondent

  10. Section 6621 - Determination of rate of interest

    26 U.S.C. § 6621   Cited 1,874 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Applying a higher interest rate to past liabilities resulting from tax-motivated transactions