3 Cited authorities
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.
395 U.S. 575 (1969) Cited 1,035 times 67 Legal AnalysesHolding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"
N.L.R.B. v. Murray-Ohio Manufacturing Company
358 F.2d 948 (6th Cir. 1966) Cited 11 timesNo. 16413. April 19, 1966. Robert B. Schwartz, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief, for petitioner. Frank A. Constangy, Atlanta, Ga., Constangy Prowell, Atlanta, Ga., on brief, for respondent. Before WEICK, Chief Judge, O'SULLIVAN, Circuit Judge, and CECIL, Senior Circuit Judge. PER CURIAM. This case is before us on the petition
National Labor Board v. Clearwater Finishing
203 F.2d 938 (4th Cir. 1953) Cited 8 timesNo. 6570. Argued April 15, 1953. Decided May 1, 1953. Frederick U. Reel, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, and Thomas R. Haley, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Frank A. Constangy, Atlanta, Ga., for respondent. Before PARKER, Chief Judge, and SOPER and DOBIE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This is a