11 Cited authorities
Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
340 U.S. 474 (1951) Cited 9,675 times 3 Legal AnalysesHolding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "
Jencks v. United States
353 U.S. 657 (1957) Cited 1,103 times 2 Legal AnalysesHolding that defendants are entitled to obtain the prior statements of persons to government agents when those persons are to testify against the defendants at trial
Radio Officers v. Labor Board
347 U.S. 17 (1954) Cited 470 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"
United States Smelting, Refining Mining v. Lowe
338 U.S. 954 (1950) Cited 51 timesNo. 489. February 13, 1950. On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Facts and opinion, 175 F.2d 486, 12 Alaska 423; 176 F.2d 813, 12 Alaska 473; D.C., 66 F. Supp. 897, 11 Alaska 184; D.C., 74 F. Supp. 917, 11 Alaska 429. PER CURIAM: The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The Court is of the opinion that a new trial should be granted. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion as to other questions presented, the judgments of the Court
Good Samaritan Med. Ctr. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
858 F.3d 617 (1st Cir. 2017) Cited 10 timesNos. 15-1347 15-1412 Nos. 15-1877 15-1941 05-31-2017 GOOD SAMARITAN MEDICAL CENTER, Petitioner, Cross-Respondent, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, Cross-Petitioner. National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner, Cross-Respondent, v. 1199 SEIU United Healthcare Workers East, Respondent, Cross-Petitioner. Joseph W. Ambash, Boston, MA, with whom Reyburn W. Lominack, III and Fisher & Phillips LLP, Columbia, SC, were on brief, for Good Samaritan Medical Center. Betsy Ehrenberg, with whom Pyle
Int'l Union v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
844 F.3d 590 (6th Cir. 2016) Cited 8 timesRecognizing three routes by which a union may be found to have breached its duty of fair representation: by conduct that is "arbitrary, discriminatory, or in bad faith"
N.L.R.B. v. Int'l Longshoremen's Ware. Union
283 F.2d 558 (9th Cir. 1960) Cited 41 timesHolding labor union culpable under Taft-Hartley Act for acts performed by its agents, i.e., by union stewards
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. National Maritime Union of America
175 F.2d 686 (2d Cir. 1949) Cited 40 timesBargaining for discriminatory hiring hall clause
N.L.R.B. v. Int. L. W. Union Local 13
581 F.2d 1321 (9th Cir. 1978) Cited 3 timesNo. 77-2313. July 21, 1978. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied September 19, 1978. William F. Wachter, Washington, D.C. (argued), for petitioner. Martha Goldin (argued), Hollywood, Cal., for respondent. Application For Enforcement of An Order of The National Labor Relations Board. Before SNEED and KENNEDY, Circuit Judges, and CALLISTER, District Judge. Hon. Marion J. Callister, United States District Judge for the District of Idaho, sitting by designation. SNEED, Circuit Judge: The underlying
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Universal Camera
179 F.2d 749 (2d Cir. 1950) Cited 24 timesNo. 54, Docket 21395. Argued December 6, 1949. Decided January 10, 1950. A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ruth Weyand, Asst. Gen. Counsel, William J. Avrutis, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Kaye, Scholer, Fierman Hays, New York City, Frederick R. Livingston, New York City, for respondent. On petition of the National Labor Relations Board for an order, "enforcing" an order of the Board to "cease