§

Grant's Home Furnishings, Inc.

229 N.L.R.B. 1305 (N.L.R.B. 1977)
Grant's Home Furnishings, Inc.

10 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. Joclin Manufacturing Company

    314 F.2d 627 (2d Cir. 1963)   Cited 50 times
    In NLRB v. Joclin Mfg. Co., 314 F.2d 627, 631-32 (2 Cir. 1963), we recognized that the Board's discretion in determining whether or not to hold a hearing was not unfettered, but we held that it could condition the right to a hearing on the existence of substantial and material issues: "[This] requirement [is] not only proper but necessary to prevent dilatory tactics by employers or unions disappointed in the election returns."

  2. Neuhoff Brothers, Packers, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    362 F.2d 611 (5th Cir. 1966)   Cited 25 times

    No. 22917. June 17, 1966. Fritz L. Lyne, Lyne, Blanchette, Smith Shelton, George C. Dunlap, Dallas, Tex., for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, George B. Driesen, Atty., N.L.R.B., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Peter Giesey, Atty., N.L.R.B., for respondent. Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, RIVES, Circuit Judge, and CHOATE, District Judge. TUTTLE, Chief Judge: This is a petition brought by the company to set aside an order of the National Labor

  3. Delta Drilling Company v. N.L.R.B

    406 F.2d 109 (5th Cir. 1969)   Cited 18 times
    In Delta Drilling Co. v. NLRB, 406 F.2d 109 (5th Cir. 1969), this court approved the decision in Athbro Precision Engineering Corp., 166 N.L.R.B. 966, 966 (1967), in which the Board concluded that "[t]he commission of an act by a Board Agent conducting an election which tends to destroy confidence in the Board's election process, or which could reasonably be interpreted as impugning the election standards we seek to maintain, is a sufficient basis for setting aside that election."

  4. Semi-Steel Casting Co. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    160 F.2d 388 (8th Cir. 1947)   Cited 44 times
    In Semi-Steel Casting Company of St. Louis v. National Labor Relations Board, 160 F.2d 388, 392, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit held that "* * * the union's loss of majority status, during the course of the proceedings before the Board on the charge of unfair labor practices against the company, if established, does not invalidate the order of the Board."

  5. Tidewater Oil Company v. N.L.R.B

    358 F.2d 363 (2d Cir. 1966)   Cited 17 times
    Distinguishing between "pump mechanics" and "maintenance mechanics"

  6. N.L.R.B. v. J.J. Collins' Sons, Inc.

    332 F.2d 523 (7th Cir. 1964)   Cited 17 times
    In NLRB v. J.J. Collins' Sons, 332 F.2d 523 (7 Cir. 1964), the Stipulation defined the unit to include "[a]ll paper cutting machine operators, all folding machine set-up men, all hand book-binders and their apprentices."

  7. Greensboro Hosiery Mills, Inc. v. Johnston

    377 F.2d 28 (4th Cir. 1967)   Cited 14 times

    No. 10164. Argued October 7, 1965. Decided May 2, 1967. Elliott Moore, Attorney, N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and Michael Sohn, Attorney, N.L.R.B., on brief), for appellant. Ernest W. Machen, Jr., Charlotte, N.C. (J.W. Alexander, Jr., and Blakeney, Alexander Machen, Charlotte, N.C., on brief), for appellee. Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, BOREMAN, Circuit Judge, and MARTIN, District Judge. BOREMAN

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Midwest Television, Inc.

    370 F.2d 287 (7th Cir. 1966)   Cited 5 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Midwest Television, Inc., 370 F.2d 287, 289 (7th Cir 1966), it is said that if the stipulation of the parties is free from ambiguity, then it is to be enforced pursuant to the intent of the parties, but "if a stipulation proved to be ambiguous as applied to particular employees," then general labor principles control.

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Standard Transformer

    202 F.2d 846 (6th Cir. 1953)   Cited 7 times

    No. 11647. March 31, 1953. Irving M. Herman, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers, Elizabeth W. Weston and Irving M. Herman, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Eugene Schwartz, Cleveland, Ohio (Stanley, Smoyer Schwartz, Cleveland, Ohio (Eugene B. Schwartz, Cleveland, Ohio), Hoppe, Day Ford, Warren, Ohio (John Q.T. Ford, Warren, Ohio), for respondent. Before SIMONS, Chief Judge, and ALLEN and MILLER, Circuit Judges. MILLER, Circuit Judge. The National

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Conlon Bros. Mfg. Co.

    187 F.2d 329 (7th Cir. 1951)   Cited 5 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Conlon Bros. Mfg. Co., 7 Cir., 187 F.2d 329, 332, we held the Rule was not unreasonable. But this is not the ordinary case.