§

Granite State Joint Board

187 N.L.R.B. 636 (N.L.R.B. 1970)
Granite State Joint Board

6 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co.

    388 U.S. 175 (1967)   Cited 334 times
    Holding that majority rule concept is at the center of federal labor policy

  2. Scofield v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    394 U.S. 423 (1969)   Cited 117 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Upholding union rule, enforceable by fines and expulsion, imposing limitation on immediate pay that members could receive for piecework because Court found no "impairment of statutory labor policy"

  3. Communications Workers v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    215 F.2d 835 (2d Cir. 1954)   Cited 18 times
    Stating that, " '[u]nder the doctrine [on withdrawal from voluntary associations] a member of a voluntary association is free to resign at will, subject of course to any financial obligations due and owing to the association"

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft, Agricultural Implement Workers

    297 F.2d 272 (1st Cir. 1961)   Cited 8 times

    No. 5828. Heard October 2, 1961. Decided December 27, 1961. Elliott Moore, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., with whom Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Frederick U. Reel, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., were on brief, for petitioner. Harold B. Roitman, Boston, Mass., for respondent. Before WOODBURY, Chief Judge, and HARTIGAN and ALDRICH, Circuit Judges. HARTIGAN, Circuit Judge. The petitioner, the National

  5. N.L.R.B. v. International Union

    320 F.2d 12 (1st Cir. 1963)   Cited 6 times

    No. 6090. July 10, 1963. Melvin J. Welles, Washington, D.C., with whom Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Arthur M. Goldberg, Washington, D.C., were on brief, for petitioner. Harold B. Roitman, Boston, Mass., for respondents. Before WOODBURY, Chief Judge, and HARTIGAN and ALDRICH, Circuit Judges. HARTIGAN, Circuit Judge. This is a petition of the National Labor Relations Board pursuant to Section 10(e) of the National

  6. Section 401 - Congressional declaration of findings, purposes, and policy

    29 U.S.C. § 401   Cited 1,042 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding that the LMRDA was essential to "afford necessary protection of the rights and interests of employees and the public generally as they relate to the activities of labor organizations . . ."