§

Granite Construction Co.

330 N.L.R.B. 205 (N.L.R.B. 1999)
Granite Construction Co.

13 Cited authorities

  1. Mastro Plastics Corp. v. Labor Board

    350 U.S. 270 (1956)   Cited 403 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that collective-bargaining agreement "must be read as a whole and in light of the law relating to it when it was made"

  2. Machinists Local v. Labor Board

    362 U.S. 411 (1960)   Cited 276 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “a finding of violation which is inescapably grounded on events predating the limitations period” is untimely

  3. Labor Board v. Lion Oil Co.

    352 U.S. 282 (1957)   Cited 139 times
    Observing that the court bears "a judicial responsibility to find that interpretation which can most fairly be said to be embedded in the statute, in the sense of being most harmonious with its scheme and with the general purposes that Congress manifested"

  4. Labor Board v. Burnup Sims

    379 U.S. 21 (1964)   Cited 106 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Finding violation of § 8 "whatever the employer's motive"

  5. Labor Board v. Rockaway News Co.

    345 U.S. 71 (1953)   Cited 128 times
    Holding that employees may bargain away their statutory right to strike

  6. Northern Wire Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    887 F.2d 1313 (7th Cir. 1989)   Cited 22 times

    Nos. 88-3278, 88-3461. Argued June 6, 1989. Decided October 26, 1989. Jack D. Walker, Susan C. Sheeran, Melli, Walker, Pease Ruhly, Madison, Wis., for Northern Wire Corporation. Aileen A. Armstrong, Collis Suzanne Stocking, Robert F. Mace, N.L.R.B. Appellate Court, Enforcement Litigation, Washington, D.C., Joseph A. Szabo, N.L.R.B., Milwaukee, Wis., for N.L.R.B. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before CUDAHY, MANION and KANNE, Circuit Judges. CUDAHY, Circuit Judge. The

  7. Ivaldi v. N.L.R.B

    48 F.3d 444 (9th Cir. 1995)   Cited 4 times

    Nos. 93-70608 and 93-70691. Argued and Submitted November 17, 1994. Decided February 23, 1995. Robert M. Cassell, Sullivan, Roche Johnson, San Francisco, CA, for petitioner-cross-respondent. Nancy B. Hunt, N.L.R.B., Washington, DC, for respondent-cross-petitioner. Petition for Review and Cross-Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before FARRIS, BOOCHEVER, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judge:Page 446 Frank Ivaldi, et al., d/b/a Sunol Valley

  8. Teamsters, Chauffeurs Helpers v. N.L.R.B

    325 F.2d 1011 (D.C. Cir. 1963)   Cited 22 times

    No. 16415. Argued November 12, 1963. Decided December 5, 1963. Mr. L.N.D. Wells, Jr., Dallas, Tex., with whom Mr. David Previant, Milwaukee, Wis., was on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. Hugh Hafer, Seattle, Wash., also entered an appearance for petitioner. Mr. Melvin Pollack, Atty., N.L.R.B., with whom Messrs. Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., were on the brief, for respondent. Mr. Alexander E. Wilson, Jr., Atlanta, Ga., with whom

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Colonial Press, Inc.

    509 F.2d 850 (8th Cir. 1975)   Cited 8 times

    No. 74-1304. Submitted October 17, 1974. Decided January 17, 1975. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied February 26, 1975. Joseph Oertel, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., made argument for petitioner. Soren S. Jensen, Swarr, May, Smith Andersen, Omaha, Neb., made argument for respondent. Irving M. King, Chicago, Ill., made argument for intervenor. Appeal from National Labor Relations Board. Before GIBSON, Chief Judge, and LAY and STEPHENSON, Circuit Judges. GIBSON, Chief

  10. United Furniture Workers of Am. v. N.L.R.B

    336 F.2d 738 (D.C. Cir. 1964)   Cited 16 times

    No. 17961. Argued February 19, 1964. Decided April 16, 1964. Certiorari Denied October 12, 1964. See 85 S.Ct. 73. Mr. Martin Raphael, New York City, of the bar of the Court of Appeals of New York, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, for petitioners. Messrs. David E. Feller and Michael H. Gottesman, Washington, D.C., also entered appearances for petitioners. Mrs. Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., N.L.R.B., with whom Messrs. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel

  11. Rule 803 - Exceptions to the Rule Against Hearsay-Regardless of Whether the Declarant Is Available as a Witness

    Fed. R. Evid. 803   Cited 12,987 times   85 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing exception to rule against hearsay for records of regularly conducted activities