Grand-Central Chrysler, Inc.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Edward Fields, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    325 F.2d 754 (2d Cir. 1963)   Cited 32 times
    In Edward Fields, Inc. v. N.L.R.B., 325 F.2d 754 (2d Cir. 1963), a vice-president of the company suggested that the employees prepare a petition calling for the return of previously signed union authorization cards and, later, prepared such a petition at the request of one of his employees.
  2. N.L.R.B. v. Solo Cup Company

    237 F.2d 521 (8th Cir. 1956)   Cited 40 times

    No. 15524. October 18, 1956. Rehearing Denied November 16, 1956. Samuel M. Singer, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., were with him on the brief), for petitioner. John J. Hasburgh, Kansas City, Mo. (Carl E. Enggas and Watson S. Marshall Enggas, Kansas City, Mo., were with him on the brief), for respondent. Before WOODROUGH

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Des Moines Foods, Inc.

    296 F.2d 285 (8th Cir. 1961)   Cited 20 times

    No. 16694. November 29, 1961. Leo N. McGuire, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. made argument for petitioner. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Samuel M. Singer, Atty., and Leo N. McGuire, Atty., NLRB, Washington, D.C. were on the brief. Hobart E. Newton, Stuart, Iowa, made argument for respondent, and was on the brief. Before SANBORN, MATTHES and RIDGE, Circuit Judges. SANBORN

  4. Eastman v. United States

    212 F.2d 320 (9th Cir. 1954)   Cited 25 times

    No. 13953. April 19, 1954. Paul H. Primock, Phoenix, Ariz., for appellants. Jack D. Hayes, U.S. Atty., Everett L. Gordon, James E. Hunter, Asst. U.S. Attys., Phoenix, Ariz., for appellee. Before HEALY and ORR, Circuit Judges, and LEMMON, District Judge. ORR, Circuit Judge. Appellants were convicted of unlawfully importing into the United States, and knowingly concealing and facilitating the transportation of 193 ounces of opium in violation of 21 U.S.C.A. ยง 174. On this appeal they complain that:

  5. NATIONAL LABOR REL. BD. v. BETTER MONKEY GRIP

    243 F.2d 836 (5th Cir. 1957)   Cited 14 times

    No. 16278. May 1, 1957. Rehearing Denied May 29, 1957. Owsley Vose, Stephen Leonard, Washington, D.C., Theophil C. Kammholz, General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Assistant General Counsel, Ruth V. Reel, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Herbert S. Bonney, Jr., William L. Keller, Dallas, Tex., for respondent. Before BORAH, RIVES and BROWN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. The National Labor Relations Board, pursuant to Sec. 10(e) of the National Labor Relations

  6. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Miss. Products

    213 F.2d 670 (5th Cir. 1954)   Cited 14 times

    No. 14753. June 18, 1954. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Arnold Ordman, Jean Engstrom, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Samuel Lang, Kullman Lang, New Orleans, La., for respondent. Before BORAH and RUSSELL, Circuit Judges, and DAWKINS, District Judge. RUSSELL, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board has petitioned this court for a decree enforcing an order entered against

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Midwestern Instruments, Inc.

    264 F.2d 829 (10th Cir. 1959)   Cited 8 times

    No. 5944. March 6, 1959. Rehearing Denied April 9, 1959. Francis Sperandeo, Washington, D.C., (Jerome D. Fenton, Thomas J. McDermott, Marcel Mallett-Prevost, Fannie M. Boyls, Washington, D.C., Donald R. Klenk, New York City, on the brief), for petitioner. R.J. Woolsey and A. Langley Coffey, Tulsa, Okla. (Farmer, Woolsey, Flippo Bailey, Coffey Coffey, Tulsa, Okla., on the brief), for respondent. Before HUXMAN, MURRAH and BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judges. HUXMAN, Circuit Judge. This is a conventional enforcement

  8. Lyons Milling Co. v. Goffe Carkener

    46 F.2d 241 (10th Cir. 1931)   Cited 40 times
    In Lyons Milling Co. v. Goffe Carkener, 10 Cir., 46 F.2d 241, page 247, 83 A.L.R. 501, the court said: "A set-off is a method by which a contract to purchase is set off against a contract to sell without the formality of an exchange of warehouse receipts or other actual delivery and, in legal effect, is a delivery."
  9. Syracuse Engineering Co. v. Haight

    97 F.2d 573 (2d Cir. 1938)   Cited 23 times

    No. 320. June 13, 1938. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of New York. Bankruptcy Proceedings by the Syracuse Engineering Company, Incorporated, and others against Julian S. Brown, in which George M. Haight, receiver of the Salt Springs National Bank of Syracuse, intervened. From an order adjudging defendant Brown a bankrupt, intervener appeals. Reversed, and new trial ordered. Laurence Sovik, of Syracuse, N.Y., for appellant. Lionel O. Grossman and Stewart