§

Grace Line, Inc.

135 N.L.R.B. 775 (N.L.R.B. 1962)
Grace Line, Inc.

3 Cited authorities

  1. B. O.S.W.R.R. Co. v. Settle

    260 U.S. 166 (1922)   Cited 131 times
    Rejecting an interstate shipper's attempt to pay lower total tariffs by shipping its goods first from one state into another, and then, after taking possession of them, re-shipping them to their ultimate destination in the latter state

  2. Baer Bros. v. Denver R.G.R.R

    233 U.S. 479 (1914)   Cited 70 times

    ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 140. Argued December 16, 17, 1913. Decided April 27, 1914. Awarding reparation for excessive charges in the past and regulating rates for the future involve the determination of matters essentially different; while they may be dealt with in one order by the Interstate Commerce Commission, an order for reparation is not void because it does not fix the rate for the future. An order of reparation is made by the Interstate Commerce Commission

  3. Missouri, Kans. Tex. Ry. Co. v. Texas

    245 U.S. 484 (1918)   Cited 6 times

    ERROR TO THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS, THIRD SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT, OF THE STATE OF TEXAS. No. 113. Submitted January 2, 1918. Decided January 14, 1918. Where, in regular course, a passenger train is moved by one company from one State to a point in another and is there taken charge of and carried to destination by a second company, local to the second State, it is manifestly erroneous to hold that its interstate character is lost because the second company employs new crews and engines and cannot