Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

Labor Board v. Katz

Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

Brooks v. Labor Board

Holding that an employer has a duty to bargain in good faith for one year beginning on the date of certification of the bargaining representative by the Board

Labor Board v. Parts Co.

Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

Vincent Industrial Plastics, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

In Vincent Industrial, we directed the Board to premise every bargaining order on an "explicit[ balanc[ing][of] three considerations: (1) the employees' Section 7 rights [ 29 U.S.C. § 157]; (2) whether other purposes of the [NLRA] override the rights of employees to choose their bargaining representatives; and (3) whether alternative remedies are adequate to remedy the violations of the [NLRA]]."

Lee Lumber & Building Material Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

Noting that, "[b]ecause affirmative bargaining orders interfere with the employee free choice that is a core principle of the Act," we "view them with suspicion" and demand special justification for them

N.L.R.B. v. Jamaica Towing, Inc.

Holding that "hallmark" violations of NLRA "include such employer misbehavior as the closing of a plant or threats of plant closure or loss of employment, the grant of benefits to employees, or the reassignment, demotion or discharge of union adherents" and lesser violations "include such employer misconduct as interrogating employees regarding their union sympathies, holding out a `carrot' of promised benefits, expressing anti-union resolve, threatening that unionization will result in decreased benefits, or suggesting that physical force might be used to exclude the union"

N.L.R.B. v. Williams Enterprises, Inc.

Upholding finding of causation where four months passed between company's anti-union statements and decertification petition

Ishikawa Gasket America, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

Geiger Ready-Mix Co., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

Holding that Board reasonably relied upon "transfer of unit work" approach in case involving double-breasted employer

Section 6621 - Determination of rate of interest

Applying a higher interest rate to past liabilities resulting from tax-motivated transactions