§
Gould, Inc.

2 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Parts Co.

    375 U.S. 405 (1964)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Schill Steel Products, Inc.

    340 F.2d 568 (5th Cir. 1965)   Cited 28 times

    No. 21110. January 11, 1965. Lawrence Gold, Atty., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Robert A. Armstrong, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for appellant. Henry L. Scott, Houston, Tex., Trotter, Childs, Fortenbach McClure, Houston, Tex., of counsel, for appellee. Before WISDOM and GEWIN, Circuit Judges, and HANNAY, District Judge. WISDOM, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement