§

Gormac Custom Mfg.

335 N.L.R.B. 1192 (N.L.R.B. 2001)
Gormac Custom Mfg.

11 Cited authorities

  1. Van Dorn Plastic Machinery Co. v. N.L.R.B

    736 F.2d 343 (6th Cir. 1984)   Cited 29 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Van Dorn Plastic Machinery Co. v. NLRB, 736 F.2d 343 (6th Cir. 1984), we stated "[t]here may be cases where no forgery can be proved, but where the misrepresentation is so pervasive and the deception so artful that employees will be unable to separate truth from untruth and where their right to a free and fair choice will be affected."

  2. Mitchellance, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    90 F.3d 1150 (6th Cir. 1996)   Cited 15 times
    Stating that the employer, who learned of a flyer distributed the day before the election, was able to effectively respond

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Hub Plastics, Inc.

    52 F.3d 608 (6th Cir. 1995)   Cited 12 times
    In NLRB v. Hub Plastics, Inc., 52 F.3d 608 (6th Cir. 1995), we held that when reviewing altered ballots on a notice, we first look to whether the source of the alteration is apparent.

  4. Dayton Hudson Dept. Store v. N.L.R.B

    987 F.2d 359 (6th Cir. 1993)   Cited 11 times
    In Dayton Hudson, a letter with substantial misrepresentations was mailed to employees three days before the election, the writers of the letter were known to be allied with the union, but, unlike here, the union won by a significant margin.

  5. Maremont Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    177 F.3d 573 (6th Cir. 1999)   Cited 5 times

    Nos. 98-5042, 98-5130 Argued: March 12, 1999 Decided: May 25, 1999 Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. No. 10-CA-30577. ARGUED: Robert J. Englehart, NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, APPELLATE COURT BRANCH, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Jonathan E. Kaplan, KIESEWETTER, WISE, KAPLAN, SCHWIMMER PRATHER, Memphis, Tennessee, for Petitioner. ON BRIEF: Robert J. Englehart, Frederick C. Havard,

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Superior Coatings, Inc.

    839 F.2d 1178 (6th Cir. 1988)   Cited 15 times

    No. 86-5587. Argued December 18, 1986. Decided February 18, 1988. Fred Cornell, argued, Aileen Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel, N.L. R.B., Howard E. Perlstein, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Craig A. Mutch, argued, Grand Rapids, Mich., and J. Michael Guenther, Ann Arbor, Mich., for respondent. Before MARTIN and GUY, Circuit Judges, and JOHNSTONE, District Judge. Honorable Edward H. Johnstone, United States District Court, Western District of Kentucky, sitting by designation. PER CURIAM

  7. Dayton Hudson Dept. Store Co. v. N.L.R.B

    79 F.3d 546 (6th Cir. 1996)   Cited 7 times
    Upholding the Board's decision after an earlier remand for an evidentiary hearing in Dayton Hudson Department Store Co. v. NLRB, 987 F.2d 359 (6th Cir. 1993)

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gormac Custom Manufacturing, Inc.

    190 F.3d 742 (6th Cir. 1999)   Cited 4 times
    In Gormac, the union had circulated a vote yes petition in the employer's offices three hours before the election, and the court ruled that the Board had abused its discretion in denying a pre-certification hearing.

  9. Contech Division v. Natioanl Labor Relations Board

    164 F.3d 297 (6th Cir. 1998)   Cited 4 times
    Holding that letters from the union during an election campaign containing arguably misleading statements did not affect the employees' right to a free and fair choice

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Burnett Construction Company

    350 F.2d 57 (10th Cir. 1965)   Cited 15 times

    No. 8039. August 6, 1965. Melvin H. Reifin, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Warren M. Davidson, Atty., N.L.R.B., with him on the brief), for petitioner. Harold B. Wagner, Denver, Colo., for respondent. Before PHILLIPS, PICKETT and LEWIS, Circuit Judges. PICKETT, Circuit Judge. This proceeding is here on the Board's petition for enforcement of its order directing respondent to cease and desist