3 Cited authorities
Franks Bros. Co. v. Labor Board
321 U.S. 702 (1944) Cited 252 times 1 Legal AnalysesRecognizing the legitimacy of the Board's view that the unlawful refusal to bargain collectively with employees' chosen representative disrupts employee morale, deters organizational activities, and discourages membership in unions.
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Stow Manufacturing Co.
217 F.2d 900 (2d Cir. 1954) Cited 31 timesNo. 74, Docket 23104. Argued October 6, 1954. Decided December 7, 1954. Fannie M. Boyls, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Jean Engstrom, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, for petitioner. George C. Coughlin, Harrison, Coughlin, Dermody Ingalls, Binghamton, N.Y., for respondent. Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and L. HAND and FRANK, Circuit Judges. L. HAND,
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Taitel
261 F.2d 1 (7th Cir. 1958) Cited 16 timesNo. 12335. October 30, 1958. Rehearing Denied December 22, 1958. Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., Sheldon M. Charone, Atty., Chicago, Ill., Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Fannie M. Boyls, Robert J. Wilson, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. George Rose, Indianapolis, Ind., for respondent. Before DUFFY, Chief Judge, HASTINGS, Circuit Judge, and WHAM, District Judge. HASTINGS, Circuit Judge. This case comes before