3 Cited authorities
N.L.R.B. v. Lighthouse for the Blind
696 F.2d 399 (5th Cir. 1983) Cited 8 timesNo. 80-1753. January 31, 1983. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied March 21, 1983. Elliott Moore, Deputy Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Sandra Williams, David Fleischer, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Donald S. Shire, Associate Sol., Barbara E. Kahl, U.S. Dept. of Labor, Washington, D.C., amicus curiae, Secretary of Labor. Eric H. Nelson, Houston, Tex., for intervenor Teamsters Local No. 968. Liddell, Sapp, Zivley, Brown Laboon, W. Robert Brown, Douglas R. Little, Houston, Tex., for respondent
Cincinnati Ass'n for the Blind v. N.L.R.B
672 F.2d 567 (6th Cir. 1982) Cited 6 timesIn Cincinnati, the Board distinguished its decision to decline jurisdiction in Goodwill Industries of Southern California, 231 N.L.R.B. 536 (1977), finding that the Cincinnati "workshop operation [was] significantly based on economic considerations" while "the single overriding purpose of the `employer-client' relationship [in Goodwill] was rehabilitation."
Arkansas Lighthouse for the Blind v. N.L.R.B
851 F.2d 180 (8th Cir. 1988) Cited 1 timesNo. 87-2099. Submitted April 13, 1988. Decided June 27, 1988. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied August 16, 1988. Gerladn P. Patten, Little Rock, Ark., for petitioner. William R. Stewart, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before BOWMAN, Circuit Judge, FLOYD R. GIBSON, Senior Circuit Judge, and HANSON, Senior District Judge. The HONORABLE WILLIAM C. HANSON, United States Senior District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa, sitting