Goodrich Corporation

26 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,697 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "
  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

    385 U.S. 432 (1967)   Cited 265 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Approving "discovery-type standard"
  3. Daniels & Kennedy, Inc. v. A/S Inger

    375 U.S. 834 (1963)   Cited 82 times
    Holding shipowner's settlement of longshoreman's injury claim reasonable and reversing judgment denying indemnity
  4. Soule Glass and Glazing Co. v. N.L.R.B

    652 F.2d 1055 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 97 times
    Holding that the employer "must bargain with respect to the decision to remove work from bargaining unit employees, not merely its effects on the employees"
  5. N.L.R.B. v. A-Plus Roofing, Inc.

    39 F.3d 1410 (9th Cir. 1994)   Cited 58 times
    Holding that a magistrate judge did not have authority under § 636(b) to conduct criminal contempt trial without consent of defendant
  6. Dorsey Trailers, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    233 F.3d 831 (4th Cir. 2000)   Cited 21 times
    Holding that as long as employer decision requires capital expenditure, decision is outside duty to bargain
  7. California Acrylic Industries, Inc. v. NLRB

    150 F.3d 1095 (9th Cir. 1998)   Cited 17 times
    Holding that surveillance can constitute "interference" in violation of the National Labor Relations Act ("NLRA"), which prohibits "interfer[ing] with, restrain[ing], or coercing employees in the exercise of the rights guaranteed" by the Act
  8. Curtiss-Wright, Wright Aero. Div. v. N.L.R.B

    347 F.2d 61 (3d Cir. 1965)   Cited 55 times
    Noting the Board has "considerable leeway in amplifying or expanding certain details not specifically set forth in the complaint if they accord with the general substance of the complaint"
  9. General Indus. Emp. Un. Local 42 v. N.L.R.B

    951 F.2d 1308 (D.C. Cir. 1991)   Cited 14 times

    No. 91-1036. Argued October 25, 1991. Decided December 27, 1991. Donald B. Greenspon, Detroit, Mich., for petitioner. William A. Baudler, Atty. N.L.R.B., with whom Jerry M. Hunter, Gen. Counsel, and Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for respondent. Beverly Oyama, Atty. N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., also entered an appearance for respondent. John S. Schauer, with whom Camille A. Olson, Chicago, Ill., was on the brief, for intervenor. Petition for

  10. Emeryville Ctr., Shell Dev. v. N.L.R.B

    441 F.2d 880 (9th Cir. 1971)   Cited 29 times
    In Emeryville, the union requested salary grade curves, individual salaries, and merit ratings for 430 unit professional employees to enable the union "to bargain intelligently."