§
Goodall Co.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Thornhill v. Alabama

    310 U.S. 88 (1940)   Cited 1,703 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a law is overbroad if it does not aim specifically at evils within the allowable area of control, but sweeps within its ambit other activities that constitute an exercise of First Amendment rights

  2. Labor Board v. Columbian Co.

    306 U.S. 292 (1939)   Cited 994 times
    Defining substantial evidence

  3. Penna. R. Co. v. Chamberlain

    288 U.S. 333 (1933)   Cited 429 times
    Holding that a witness who merely heard a crash of cars, without witnessing the focal death, did not present a genuine issue of material fact as his testimony amounted to speculation about the facts

  4. Labor Board v. Virginia Power Co.

    314 U.S. 469 (1941)   Cited 169 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In NLRB v. Virginia Electric Power Co., 314 U.S. 469, 477, 62 S.Ct. 344, 348, 86 L.Ed. 348 (1941), the Supreme court concluded that the Wagner Act could not be interpreted to prohibit an employer from exercising his First Amendment right to express his views to employees on the merits of unionization, provided the expression was neither coercive nor part of a coercive course of conduct.

  5. Matter of Goodall

    271 A.D.2d 800 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

    April 13, 2000. Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 27, 1999, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling, inter alia, that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct. Revington O. Goodall, New York City, appellant in person. Before: CARDONA, P.J., CREW III, SPAIN, CARPINELLO and GRAFFEO, JJ. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER The record reveals that claimant