§

Good Life Beverage Co.

312 N.L.R.B. 1060 (N.L.R.B. 1993)
Good Life Beverage Co.

15 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 712 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  2. Radio Union v. Broadcast Serv

    380 U.S. 255 (1965)   Cited 327 times
    Holding that two entities were a single employer and therefore that their gross receipts could be totaled together to establish jurisdiction under the National Labor Relations Act

  3. Labor Board v. Truitt Mfg. Co.

    351 U.S. 149 (1956)   Cited 223 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the duty to produce information relevant to a bargaining issue is derivative from the broader statutory duty to bargain in good-faith

  4. Labor Board v. Deena Artware

    361 U.S. 398 (1960)   Cited 139 times
    Ruling that derivative liability could be imposed on the basis of single employer status

  5. Penntech Papers, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    706 F.2d 18 (1st Cir. 1983)   Cited 121 times
    Holding that same day notice was inadequate where company failed to bargain in good faith after the closure

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fullerton Transfer & Storage Ltd.

    910 F.2d 331 (6th Cir. 1990)   Cited 91 times
    Articulating the alter-ego standard as “whether the two enterprises have substantially identical management, business purpose, operation, equipment, customers, supervision and ownership”

  7. Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers Local Union No. 6-418 v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    711 F.2d 348 (D.C. Cir. 1983)   Cited 41 times

    Nos. 82-1418 to 82-1420, 82-1743, 82-1589 and 82-1940. Argued May 5, 1983. Decided June 30, 1983. George H. Cohen, with whom Laurence Gold, Washington, D.C., was on brief, for petitioners, Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers, Local Union No. 6-418, AFL-CIO, et al. George J. Tichy, II, San Francisco, Cal., with whom Robert K. Carrol, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner, Borden Chemical, A Division of Borden, Inc. Howard A. Crawford, with whom Jack D. Rowe, Kansas City, Mo., was on brief, for petitioner

  8. Royal Typewriter Co. v. N.L.R.B

    533 F.2d 1030 (8th Cir. 1976)   Cited 34 times
    Rejecting the Board's narrow reading of Fibreboard in Ozark Trailers, Inc., 161 NLRB 561, 564-70 that an employer operating two or more plants is obligated to bargain with respect to the closing of one of them

  9. Procter Gamble Mfg. Co. v. N.L.R.B

    658 F.2d 968 (4th Cir. 1981)   Cited 13 times
    Holding that the options available to the employer under the NLRB's remedial order — including "leeway . . . to meet evenings or weekends rather than to grant any uncompensated leave" — "demonstrate that the Board's order does not impose a new contractual provision upon the parties," but rather "serves only to remedy the unfair labor practices found in this case"

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ogle Protection Service, Inc.

    375 F.2d 497 (6th Cir. 1967)   Cited 29 times

    No. 16996. April 7, 1967. Clarice Feldman, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Elliott Moore, Attorney, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief, for petitioner. David E. Burgess, Detroit, Mich., MacFarlane, Tolleson, Burgess Mead, Robert D. Welchli, Detroit, Mich., on brief, for respondents. Before O'SULLIVAN and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and CECIL, Senior Circuit Judge. CECIL, Senior