§

Goldens Foundry & Machine Co.

340 N.L.R.B. 1176 (N.L.R.B. 2003)
Goldens Foundry & Machine Co.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  3. Grand Rapids Die Casting Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    831 F.2d 112 (6th Cir. 1987)   Cited 12 times
    In Grand Rapids Die Casting Corp. v. NLRB, 831 F.2d 112 (6th Cir. 1987), the Sixth Circuit held that the antiunion animus of a supervisor could be attributed to the company because, even though that supervisor was not the decisionmaker, he knew of the employee's protected activities and was involved in the decision to fire the employee.

  4. JMC Transport, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    776 F.2d 612 (6th Cir. 1985)   Cited 8 times

    Nos. 84-5960, 84-6060. Argued August 22, 1985. Decided November 12, 1985. D. Patton Pelfrey, Charles E. Allen, III (argued), Brown, Todd and Heyburn, James H. Massey, Mark B. Davis, Jr., Louisville, Ky., for petitioner. Elliott Moore, Elinor Stillman (argued), Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before MERRITT and WELLFORD, Circuit Judges, and CELEBREZZE, Senior Circuit Judge. MERRITT, Circuit Judge

  5. Boston Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. N.L.R.B

    692 F.2d 169 (1st Cir. 1982)   Cited 8 times
    Expressing reluctance "to adopt a rule that would permit the company to launder the `bad' motives of certain of its supervisors by forwarding a dispassionate report to a neutral superior"

  6. Section 102.35 - Duties and powers of Administrative Law Judges; stipulations of cases to Administrative Law Judges or to the Board; assignment and powers of settlement judges

    29 C.F.R. § 102.35   Cited 14 times

    (a) The Administrative Law Judge will inquire fully into the facts as to whether the Respondent has engaged in or is engaging in an unfair labor practice affecting commerce as set forth in the complaint or amended complaint. The Administrative Law Judge has authority, with respect to cases assigned to the Judge, between the time the Judge is designated and transfer of the case to the Board, subject to the Rules and Regulations of the Board and within its powers, to: (1) Administer oaths and affirmations