§

Globe Products Corp.

102 N.L.R.B. 278 (N.L.R.B. 1953)
Globe Products Corp.

17 Cited authorities

  1. I.A. of M. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 72 (1940)   Cited 317 times
    In International Ass'n of Machinists v. N.L.R.B., 1940, 311 U.S. 72, 61 S.Ct. 83, 85 L. Ed. 50, there had been a long history of management favoritism to the established and hostility to the aspiring union; and in Franks Bros. Co. v. N.L.R.B., 1944, 321 U.S. 702, 703, 64 S.Ct. 817, 818, 88 L.Ed. 1020, the employer had "conducted an aggressive campaign against the Union, even to the extent of threatening to close its factory if the union won the election."

  2. Franks Bros. Co. v. Labor Board

    321 U.S. 702 (1944)   Cited 252 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing the legitimacy of the Board's view that the unlawful refusal to bargain collectively with employees' chosen representative disrupts employee morale, deters organizational activities, and discourages membership in unions.

  3. Republic Steel Corp. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 7 (1940)   Cited 231 times   3 Legal Analyses
    In Republic Steel, supra, the Court refused to enforce an order requiring the employer to pay the full amount of back pay to an employee who had been paid to work for the Work Projects Administration in the meantime.

  4. Labor Board v. Bradford Dyeing Assn

    310 U.S. 318 (1940)   Cited 150 times
    Construing "affecting commerce"

  5. Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".

  6. National Labor Rel. Board v. Baldwin L. Works

    128 F.2d 39 (3d Cir. 1942)   Cited 60 times
    Modifying and enforced an order by the Board

  7. F.W. Woolworth Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    121 F.2d 658 (2d Cir. 1941)   Cited 36 times

    No. 276. July 2, 1941. Petition to Review and Set Aside an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by F.W. Woolworth Company to review and set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board, and request by the board to enforce its order. Petition to review the order denied, and request for enforcement of order as modified in accordance with opinion granted. Thomas I. Sheridan and Howard L. Klein, both of New York City, for petitioner. Robert B. Watts, Laurence A. Knapp, Ernest

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Chicago Apparatus Co.

    116 F.2d 753 (7th Cir. 1941)   Cited 35 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Chicago Apparatus Co., 116 F.2d 753, 756, and National Labor Relations Board v. Howell Chevrolet Co., 204 F.2d 79, 83, cases cited and relied upon by the defendant, such a written designation had been obtained.

  9. National Lbr. R. Bd. v. George P. Pilling Son

    119 F.2d 32 (3d Cir. 1941)   Cited 26 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. George P. Pilling Son Co. (119 F.2d 32) the court said, at page 37: "there must be common willingness among the parties to discuss freely and fully their respective claims and demands and, when these are opposed, to justify them on reason.

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Consol. Mach. Tool

    163 F.2d 376 (2d Cir. 1947)   Cited 15 times

    No. 236, Docket 20516. July 25, 1947. Writ of Certiorari Denied November 17, 1947. See 68 S.Ct. 164. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board, petitioner, against the Consolidated Machine Tool Corporation, respondent, for enforcement of the petitioner's order requiring respondent to cease and desist from certain unfair labor practices and to bargain collectively with Pattern Makers League of North America, A.F. of L. Enforcement granted of the order as modified. Gerhard P. Van Arkel, Gen. Counsel