§

Glenna O. v. Dep’t of the Air Force

EEOC Appeal No. 0720180030 (E.E.O.C. Aug. 20, 2019)
Glenna O. v. Dep’t of the Air Force

20 Cited authorities

  1. Harris v. Forklift Sys., Inc.

    510 U.S. 17 (1993)   Cited 12,777 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "no single factor is required" to show a hostile work environment, including "whether [the acts are] physically threatening"

  2. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. Darden

    503 U.S. 318 (1992)   Cited 1,522 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that where the statute does not helpfully define the term "employee," courts should apply its established meaning

  3. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,712 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

  4. Pullman-Standard v. Swint

    456 U.S. 273 (1982)   Cited 1,630 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[w]hen an appellate court discerns that a district court has failed to make a finding because of an erroneous view of the law, the usual rule is that there should be a remand for further proceedings to permit the trial court to make the missing findings"

  5. Henson v. City of Dundee

    682 F.2d 897 (11th Cir. 1982)   Cited 984 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that where a supervisor makes sexual overtures to employees of both genders, or where the conduct is equally offensive to male and female workers, the conduct may be actionable under state law, but it is not actionable as harassment under Title VII because men and women are accorded like treatment

  6. Carrier Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    768 F.2d 778 (6th Cir. 1985)   Cited 80 times
    Holding that companies are joint employers when "two or more employers exert significant control over the same employees-where from the evidence it can be shown that they share or co-determine those matters governing essential terms and conditions of employment"

  7. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Skanska USA Building, Inc.

    550 F. App'x 253 (6th Cir. 2013)   Cited 25 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Skanska, a machine operator, Maurice Knox, was directly employed by a subcontractor, C-1, while working at a construction site managed by Skanska.

  8. Section 2000e - Definitions

    42 U.S.C. § 2000e   Cited 52,922 times   132 Legal Analyses
    Granting EEOC authority to issue procedural regulations to carry out Title VII provisions

  9. Section 2000e-5 - Enforcement provisions

    42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5   Cited 27,678 times   124 Legal Analyses
    Holding charges must be made in writing, under oath, and contain all information as the Commission requires

  10. Section 2000e-16 - Employment by Federal Government

    42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16   Cited 5,067 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Adopting provisions of § 2000e-5(f)-(k), including that "[e]ach United States district court . . . shall have jurisdiction of actions brought under this subchapter"

  11. Section 791 - Employment of individuals with disabilities

    29 U.S.C. § 791   Cited 2,320 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Adopting standards for ADA claims under § 501 of the Rehabilitation Act, including 42 U.S.C. § 12112, which forbids discrimination "against a qualified individual with a disability because of the disability . . ."

  12. Section 1614.407 - Civil action: Title VII, Age Discrimination in Employment Act, Rehabilitation Act, Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act, and Pregnant Workers Fairness Act

    29 C.F.R. § 1614.407   Cited 763 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Authorizing civil actions if no final action is taken within 180 days after a complaint is filed

  13. Section 1614.103 - Complaints of discrimination covered by this part

    29 C.F.R. § 1614.103   Cited 212 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Stating that complaints of discrimination within the federal government extend to "all employment policies or practices affecting employees or applicants for employment "

  14. Section 1614.604 - Filing and computation of time

    29 C.F.R. § 1614.604   Cited 140 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Providing the time limits applicable to the subject regulations "are subject to waiver, estoppel and equitable tolling"

  15. Section 1614.405 - Decisions on appeals

    29 C.F.R. § 1614.405   Cited 83 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Providing that " decision [of the EEOC in an administrative appeal] is final . . . unless . . . [e]ither party files a timely request for reconsideration"

  16. Section 1614.503 - Enforcement of final Commission decisions

    29 C.F.R. § 1614.503   Cited 64 times
    Describing civil action for enforcement of administrative award

  17. Section 1614.409 - Effect of filing a civil action

    29 C.F.R. § 1614.409   Cited 51 times
    Stating that: "Filing a civil action under § 1614.408 or § 1614.409 shall terminate Commission processing of the appeal"

  18. Section 1614.501 - Remedies and relief

    29 C.F.R. § 1614.501   Cited 45 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Incorporating § 1920 into the regulations

  19. Section 550.805 - Back pay computations

    5 C.F.R. § 550.805   Cited 35 times
    Stating that, although "outside earnings ... undertaken to replace" the employment from which an employee has been wrongfully separated should be deducted in calculating backpay, "earnings from additional or ‘moonlight’ employment the employee may have engaged in while Federally employed (before separation) and while erroneously separated" should not be deducted

  20. Section 1614.403 - How to appeal

    29 C.F.R. § 1614.403   Cited 34 times
    Indicating that failure to file timely appeal requires dismissal by EEOC