Glendale Associates, Ltd.

15 Cited authorities

Ward v. Rock Against Racism
491 U.S. 781 (1989) Cited 2,935 times 8 Legal Analyses
Holding that music is protected expression
DeBartolo Corp. v. Fla. Gulf Coast Trades Council
485 U.S. 568 (1988) Cited 729 times 10 Legal Analyses
Holding that a union’s distribution of handbills at the entrances of a shopping mall was not threatening, coercing, or restraining within meaning of section 8(b) because there had been "no violence, picketing, or patrolling," and "no suggestion that the leaflets had any coercive effect on customers of the mall"
Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins
447 U.S. 74 (1980) Cited 735 times 10 Legal Analyses
Holding that "views expressed by members of the public" in a privately owned shopping mall "will not likely be identified with those of the owner"
Lechmere, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
502 U.S. 527 (1992) Cited 156 times 18 Legal Analyses
Holding that Board erred in finding that employer should have allowed union on its premises because it had no other way to reach its target audience, inasmuch as in reaching its decision the Board misconstrued prior Supreme Court precedent
Robins v. Pruneyard Shopping Center
23 Cal.3d 899 (Cal. 1979) Cited 228 times 12 Legal Analyses
Holding that California's constitution protected free speech and petitioning, reasonably exercised, in privately owned shopping centers
N.L.R.B. v. Calkins
187 F.3d 1080 (9th Cir. 1999) Cited 53 times 2 Legal Analyses
Recognizing that Nevada law does not extend special protection to free speech interests at the expense of a private store owner's property interest
Patel v. Scotland Memorial Hosp
91 F.3d 132 (4th Cir. 1996) Cited 55 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that a realtor association's database was not a “trade secret” because it had been “distributed widely to its realtor members and potential purchasers”
Allred v. Harris
14 Cal.App.4th 1386 (Cal. Ct. App. 1993) Cited 37 times
Holding that private medical center was not constitutionally compelled to allow access for free speech activity where the center provided services to specific clientele and posted signs reading "Patient Parking Only" in its parking lot
Meijer, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Bd.
130 F.3d 1209 (6th Cir. 1997) Cited 15 times
Holding that under the balancing test in Republic Aviation, 324 U.S. 793, 65 S.Ct. 982, 89 L.Ed. 1372, "employees have a right to wear union insignia" on employerowned uniforms
Cleveland Real Estate Partners v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
95 F.3d 457 (6th Cir. 1996) Cited 16 times
Recognizing that "there is a substantial difference between the rights of employees and of nonemployees with respect to the distribution of union literature on privately owned property"

Glendale Associates, Ltd.

15 Cited authorities

Holding that music is protected expression

Holding that "views expressed by members of the public" in a privately owned shopping mall "will not likely be identified with those of the owner"

Holding that Board erred in finding that employer should have allowed union on its premises because it had no other way to reach its target audience, inasmuch as in reaching its decision the Board misconstrued prior Supreme Court precedent

Holding that California's constitution protected free speech and petitioning, reasonably exercised, in privately owned shopping centers

Recognizing that Nevada law does not extend special protection to free speech interests at the expense of a private store owner's property interest

Holding that a realtor association's database was not a “trade secret” because it had been “distributed widely to its realtor members and potential purchasers”

Holding that private medical center was not constitutionally compelled to allow access for free speech activity where the center provided services to specific clientele and posted signs reading "Patient Parking Only" in its parking lot

Holding that under the balancing test in Republic Aviation, 324 U.S. 793, 65 S.Ct. 982, 89 L.Ed. 1372, "employees have a right to wear union insignia" on employerowned uniforms

Recognizing that "there is a substantial difference between the rights of employees and of nonemployees with respect to the distribution of union literature on privately owned property"