3 Cited authorities
Labor Board v. Crompton Mills
337 U.S. 217 (1949) Cited 102 timesHolding unlawful unilateral changes significantly different from "any which the employer has proposed" during bargaining
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Yawman & Erbe Mfg. Co.
187 F.2d 947 (2d Cir. 1951) Cited 34 timesNo. 107, Docket 21789. Argued February 7, 1951. Decided March 28, 1951. George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, Frederick U. Reel and Raymond M. Norton, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, all of Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Nixon, Hargrave, Middleton Devans, Rochester, N.Y., for respondent; Arthur L. Stern and William H. Morris, Rochester, N Y, of counsel. Before L. HAND, Chief Judge, and SWAN and FRANK,
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Whitin Mach. Works
217 F.2d 593 (4th Cir. 1954) Cited 25 timesNo. 6883. November 18, 1954. Decided December 8, 1954. Frederick U. Reel, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, and James A. Ryan, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief), for petitioner. Whiteford S. Blakeney, Charlotte, N.C. (Pierce Blakeney, Charlotte, N.C., on brief), for respondent. Before PARKER, Chief Judge, and SOPER and DOBIE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This is a petition by the National Labor