§

Gibson Greetings

310 N.L.R.B. 1286 (N.L.R.B. 1993)
Gibson Greetings

10 Cited authorities

  1. Belknap, Inc. v. Hale

    463 U.S. 491 (1983)   Cited 278 times
    Holding that the NLRA does not preempt state law contract actions by replacement workers to enforce terms of an employment contract

  2. Mastro Plastics Corp. v. Labor Board

    350 U.S. 270 (1956)   Cited 403 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that collective-bargaining agreement "must be read as a whole and in light of the law relating to it when it was made"

  3. Labor Board v. Mackay Co.

    304 U.S. 333 (1938)   Cited 535 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer may replace striking workers with others to carry on business so long as the employer is not guilty of unfair labor practices

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fant Milling Co.

    360 U.S. 301 (1959)   Cited 106 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an untimely allegation of an unlawful unilateral wage increase was sufficiently related to a timely refusal-to-bargain charge, because the wage increase "largely influenced" the Board's finding that an unlawful refusal to bargain had occurred

  5. Laidlaw Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    414 F.2d 99 (7th Cir. 1969)   Cited 81 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that while an employer is not obligated to discharge permanent replacements to make room for returning economic strikers, the employer must place the former strikers on a preferential recall list

  6. Teamsters Local Union No. 515 v. N.L.R.B

    906 F.2d 719 (D.C. Cir. 1990)   Cited 11 times
    Emphasizing that "rigid adherence to disadvantageous proposals may provide a basis for inferring bad faith"

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Trident Seafoods Corp.

    642 F.2d 1148 (9th Cir. 1981)   Cited 9 times

    No. 79-7545. Argued and Submitted September 9, 1980. Decided March 23, 1981. Susan L. Williams, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Eugene R. Nielson, Lane, Powell, Moss Miller, Seattle, Wash., for respondent. On Petition for Review and Cross-application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before SNEED and FLETCHER, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON, District Judge. The Hon. William J. Jameson, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Montana, sitting by designation

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Charles D. Bonanno Linen Service

    782 F.2d 7 (1st Cir. 1986)

    No. 85-1031. Argued November 14, 1985. Decided January 24, 1986. John G. Elligers, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. James T. Grady, with whom Gabriel O. Dumont, Jr., Boston, Mass., was on brief, for intervenor. Howard I. Wilgoren, with whom Arthur V. Brown and Lepie, Coven Wilgoren, Framingham, Mass., were on brief, for respondent. Petition from The National Labor Relations Board. Before CAMPBELL, Chief Judge, BOWNES and TORRUELLA, Circuit Judges. BOWNES, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Hicks-Ponder Co.

    458 F.2d 19 (5th Cir. 1972)   Cited 1 times

    No. 71-1930. March 21, 1972. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Michael S. Winer, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., C. Woodrow Greene, Director-Region 28, N.L.R.B., Albuquerque, N.M., Eugene G. Goslee, Acting Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Herman M. Levy, Joseph C. Thackery, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. John Edward Price Associates, Fort Worth, Tex., for respondent. Before GEWIN, AINSWORTH and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: The respondent

  10. Rubin Bros. Footwear v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    203 F.2d 486 (5th Cir. 1953)   Cited 17 times
    In Rubin Bros. Footwear v. National Labor Relations Bd., 203 F.2d 486 (C.C.A. 5th), the Court said: "If anything is settled in labor law and under the act, we think it is that membership in a union does not guarantee the member against a discharge as such. It affords protection against discharge only where it is established that the discharge is because of union activity."