Gerace Construction, Inc.

14 Cited authorities

Edison Co. v. Labor Board
305 U.S. 197 (1938) Cited 19,469 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding that a Board order cannot be grounded in hearsay
Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor Board
313 U.S. 177 (1941) Cited 873 times
Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Great Dane Trailers, Inc.
388 U.S. 26 (1967) Cited 323 times 8 Legal Analyses
Holding that substantial evidence supported the Board's finding of discriminatory conduct as the Company failed to meet its burden of establishing legitimate motives for its conduct
Radio Officers v. Labor Board
347 U.S. 17 (1954) Cited 471 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.
385 U.S. 432 (1967) Cited 265 times 4 Legal Analyses
Approving "discovery-type standard"
Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board
324 U.S. 793 (1945) Cited 495 times 34 Legal Analyses
Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."
Labor Board v. Deena Artware
361 U.S. 398 (1960) Cited 139 times
Ruling that derivative liability could be imposed on the basis of single employer status
Carpenters Local v. Labor Board
365 U.S. 651 (1961) Cited 84 times
Noting Board's authority is remedial, not punitive
Crown Central Petroleum Corp. v. N.L.R.B
430 F.2d 724 (5th Cir. 1970) Cited 40 times
In Crown Central Petroleum Corp. v. NLRB, 430 F.2d 724 (5th Cir. 1970), which the Board cites, the Fifth Circuit focussed on the context of the misconduct as the key to deciding whether the misconduct was protected by the Act.
Prudential Insurance Company of Am. v. N.L.R.B
412 F.2d 77 (2d Cir. 1969) Cited 34 times
Recognizing that bargaining obligation "extends to . . . the administration of [CBAs] already adopted"

Gerace Construction, Inc.

14 Cited authorities

Holding that a Board order cannot be grounded in hearsay

Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”

Holding that substantial evidence supported the Board's finding of discriminatory conduct as the Company failed to meet its burden of establishing legitimate motives for its conduct

Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"

Approving "discovery-type standard"

Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."

Ruling that derivative liability could be imposed on the basis of single employer status

Noting Board's authority is remedial, not punitive

In Crown Central Petroleum Corp. v. NLRB, 430 F.2d 724 (5th Cir. 1970), which the Board cites, the Fifth Circuit focussed on the context of the misconduct as the key to deciding whether the misconduct was protected by the Act.

Recognizing that bargaining obligation "extends to . . . the administration of [CBAs] already adopted"