Georgia-Pacific Corp.

4 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Brown

    380 U.S. 278 (1965)   Cited 473 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Approving finding of § 8 violation when "employers' conduct is demonstrably so destructive of employee rights and so devoid of significant service to any legitimate business end that it cannot be tolerated consistently with the Act"
  2. Inter-Collegiate Press, v. N.L.R.B

    486 F.2d 837 (8th Cir. 1973)   Cited 23 times

    Nos. 72-1573, 72-1749. Submitted September 10, 1973. Decided October 25, 1973. Alvin D. Shapiro, Kansas City, Mo., for Intercollegiate Press. William O. Eisler, Kansas City, Mo., for Bookbinders. William DuRoss, III, Atty., NLRB, Washington, D.C., for National Labor Relations Board. Appeal from the National Labor Relations Board. Before GIBSON and BRIGHT, Circuit Judges, and SMITH, Senior District Judge. The Honorable Talbot Smith, Senior District Judge, Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation

  3. Johns-Manville Products Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    557 F.2d 1126 (5th Cir. 1977)   Cited 11 times
    Discussing balancing of employee and employer interests
  4. Lane v. N.L.R.B

    418 F.2d 1208 (D.C. Cir. 1969)   Cited 11 times
    In Lane v. N.L.R.B., 418 F.2d 1208, 1209-12 (D.C. Cir. 1969), the Supreme Court's approach to § 8(a)(1) and § 8(a)(3) of the Act was described as being in a "state of flux".