Georgetown Steel Corp.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Interstate Circuit v. U.S.

    306 U.S. 208 (1939)   Cited 512 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding proof of an explicit agreement unnecessary to establish antitrust conspiracy among movie distributors where, "knowing that concerted action was contemplated and invited, the distributors gave their adherence to the scheme and participated in it"
  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Dinion Coil Co.

    201 F.2d 484 (2d Cir. 1952)   Cited 96 times
    Observing that "methods of evaluating the credibility of oral testimony do not lend themselves to formulations in terms of rules"
  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Thayer Co.

    213 F.2d 748 (1st Cir. 1954)   Cited 40 times
    In Thayer, the court first announced that if the activity causing dismissal was protected under § 7 of the Act then denial of reinstatement was unlawful. If the activity was unprotected under § 7, however, the legality of the denial was to be determined according to a balancing test.
  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Draper Corp.

    145 F.2d 199 (4th Cir. 1944)   Cited 48 times

    No. 5239. October 6, 1944. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of an order of the Board which directed the Draper Corporation to cease and desist from unfair labor practices. Petition denied. Guy Farmer, Associate General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, of Washington, D.C. (Alvin J. Rockwell, General Counsel, Malcolm F. Halliday, Associate General Counsel, Joseph B. Robison, and Dominick

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Breitling

    378 F.2d 663 (10th Cir. 1967)   Cited 13 times
    Holding that employer could discharge employee for theft
  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Southland Mfg. Co.

    201 F.2d 244 (4th Cir. 1952)   Cited 29 times
    Recognizing that Board's legitimately drawn conclusion in discharge proceeding is "binding upon the courts" because courts "are without power to find facts or to substitute their judgment for that of the Board"
  7. Hartsell Mills Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    111 F.2d 291 (4th Cir. 1940)   Cited 41 times

    No. 4592. April 10, 1940. On Petition for Review of Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the Hartsell Mills Company to review an order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition denied; order modified and enforced. Edwin A. Lucas, of Philadelphia, Pa. (Benjamin W. Parham and Parham Taylor, all of Oxford, N.C., and Drinker, Biddle Reath, of Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for petitioner. Bertram Edises, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, of Washington, D.C., (Charles

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Southern Materials Company

    345 F.2d 240 (4th Cir. 1965)   Cited 6 times

    No. 9604. Argued January 7, 1965. Decided April 28, 1965. Paul J. Spielberg, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., N.L.R.B., on brief), for petitioner. Daniel R. Coffman, Jr., Jacksonville, Fla. (Hamilton, Bowden Coffman, Jacksonville, Fla., on brief), for respondent. Before SOBELOFF and BRYAN, Circuit Judges, and HUTCHESON, District Judge. STERLING HUTCHESON, District Judge

  9. United Steelworkers v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    243 F.2d 593 (D.C. Cir. 1956)   Cited 6 times

    Nos. 12754, 12812. Argued September 10, 1956. Decided November 23, 1956. Writ of Certiorari Granted April 1, 1957. See 77 S.Ct. 682. Mr. Arthur J. Goldberg, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. David E. Feller, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioner in No. 12754 and intervenor in No. 12812. Mr. Arnold Ordman, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, of the bar of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court, with whom Mr. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Associate