§
Gentile Pontiac

5 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,038 times   71 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Jamaica Towing, Inc.

    632 F.2d 208 (2d Cir. 1980)   Cited 50 times
    Holding that "hallmark" violations of NLRA "include such employer misbehavior as the closing of a plant or threats of plant closure or loss of employment, the grant of benefits to employees, or the reassignment, demotion or discharge of union adherents" and lesser violations "include such employer misconduct as interrogating employees regarding their union sympathies, holding out a `carrot' of promised benefits, expressing anti-union resolve, threatening that unionization will result in decreased benefits, or suggesting that physical force might be used to exclude the union"

  3. Hedstrom Co. v. N.L.R.B

    629 F.2d 305 (3d Cir. 1980)   Cited 43 times
    Affirming the Board's finding that a supervisor's statement was coercive, despite employee testimony suggesting otherwise, because the record supported both interpretations

  4. N.L.R.B. v. L.B. Foster Company

    418 F.2d 1 (9th Cir. 1969)   Cited 47 times
    In Foster, the Ninth Circuit answered: "Emphasis is given to the rapid turnover in the employer's personnel as a reason for not enforcing the order.

  5. Faith Garment Co. v. N.L.R.B

    630 F.2d 630 (8th Cir. 1980)   Cited 1 times

    No. 79-1987. Submitted June 10, 1980. Decided September 18, 1980. Hugo Swan, Jr., Fort Smith, Ark., for petitioner. Susan Lynn Mandle, Atty., Washington, D.C., for respondent, respondent-intervenor. Petition for review of an order from the National Labor Relations Board. Before HEANEY and ARNOLD, Circuit Judges, and OVERTON, District Judge. The Hon. William R. Overton, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, sitting by designation. OVERTON, District Judge. This case is