§

Genesee Foundry Co., Inc.

109 N.L.R.B. 1253 (N.L.R.B. 1954)
Genesee Foundry Co., Inc.

16 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Mackay Co.

    304 U.S. 333 (1938)   Cited 535 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer may replace striking workers with others to carry on business so long as the employer is not guilty of unfair labor practices

  2. Franks Bros. Co. v. Labor Board

    321 U.S. 702 (1944)   Cited 252 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing the legitimacy of the Board's view that the unlawful refusal to bargain collectively with employees' chosen representative disrupts employee morale, deters organizational activities, and discourages membership in unions.

  3. Superior Engraving Co. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    183 F.2d 783 (7th Cir. 1950)   Cited 44 times
    In Superior Engraving Co. v. National LaborRel. Bd., 183 F.2d 783, 789 (7 Cir. 1950), certiorari denied 340 U.S. 930, 71 S.Ct. 490, 95 L.Ed. 671 (1951), the court recently declined to apply Sohn v. Waterson, supra, to an amendatory provision in the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 160(b), that "no complaint shall issue based upon any unfair labor practice occurring more than six months prior to the filing of the charge with the Board."

  4. National Labor Bd. v. Sanson Hosiery Mills

    195 F.2d 350 (5th Cir. 1952)   Cited 34 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Sanson Hosiery Mills, 5 Cir., 195 F.2d 350, this court held that when the Board has duly certified a bargaining representative, such certification must be respected by the employer until set aside by the Board, even though the Union has meanwhile lost its majority support of the employees.

  5. Wayside Press v. National Labor Relations Bd.

    206 F.2d 862 (9th Cir. 1953)   Cited 28 times
    In Wayside Press, Inc., v. N.L.R.B., 9 Cir., 206 F.2d 862, we held that an employer's furnishing of facilities and assistance for the organization of an inside union does not establish employer domination of such union, unless it occurs in a setting of such manifest employer preference for the proposed independent union or hostility toward an outside union that it intrudes upon the freedom of choice which the Act was designed to secure to employees.

  6. National Lbr. Rel. Bd. v. Botany Worsted Mills

    133 F.2d 876 (3d Cir. 1943)   Cited 42 times

    Nos. 8132, 8133. Argued November 18, 1942. Decided January 18, 1943. Appeal from the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board to enforce the Board's order against the Botany Worsted Mills, and petition by the Botany Worsted Mills to set aside the Board's order. The Botany Worsted Mills moved to consolidate the petitions and for leave to adduce additional evidence. Petition of Board granted with modification in accordance with opinion, and petition of the respondent

  7. Majure v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    198 F.2d 735 (5th Cir. 1952)   Cited 21 times

    No. 13762. July 18, 1952. E.L. Snow, J.A. Covington, Jr., Meridian, Miss., for petitioner. John F. Preston, Jr., A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, D.P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., National Labor Relations Board. Before HOLMES, RUSSELL and RIVES, Circuit Judges. RUSSELL, Circuit Judge. L.L. Majure and Mrs. Jo M. Majure, trading as Majure Transport Company, which will be referred to herein as the company, or employer, petition this Court to review and set aside an order

  8. National L. Rel. Board v. Appalachian E. Power

    140 F.2d 217 (4th Cir. 1944)   Cited 29 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Appalachian Electric Power Co., 4 Cir., 140 F.2d 217, 224, the court, following the rule announced in the Third Circuit in National Labor Relations Board v. Botany Worsted Mills Co., supra, held that where a bargaining agent was selected by employees in an election supervised by the Board, they could not repudiate it within ten weeks thereafter, as such conduct would preclude the adequate protection of the very rights which the Act was designed to secure.

  9. Nat. Lab. Rel. Bd. v. Globe Automatic Sprinkler

    199 F.2d 64 (3d Cir. 1952)   Cited 17 times

    No. 10718. Argued June 3, 1952. Decided September 30, 1952. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen., Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Mary Williamson, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for appellant. Richard C. Bull, Philadelphia, Pa. (White, Williams Scott, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for respondent. Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and KALODNER and STALEY, Circuit Judges. KALODNER

  10. Mid-Continent Petroleum v. Natl. Lab. Rel. Bd.

    204 F.2d 613 (6th Cir. 1953)   Cited 11 times
    In Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp. v. NLRB, 204 F.2d 613, 614 (6th Cir. 1953), there was also evidence of high employee turnover and the employees had notified their employer by letter of their desire not to be represented by the union.